메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
The Academy of Korean Studies THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES Vol.8 No.2 JUNE 2005
발행연도
2005.6
수록면
13 - 44 (32page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The goal of this study is to review how “things Korean” (Joseonjeogin geot) became important when the significant, the “Orient,” was connected with a new signifie by emphasizing a traditional literary magazine, Munjang (Literature), published in the late Japanese colonial period.
Munjang, published under the influence of “the movement for Korean studies” that tried to newly find and emphasize the cultural tradition of Joseon, was often evaluated as a typical example of preserving the cultural identity of Joseon in the history of Korean literature during the late period of Japanese colonial rule. But the period between February 1939 and April 1941 when Munjang was published was also the time a narrative about the collapse of the Occidental and the rise of the Orient was very popular in public cultural discourse. Of course, this narrative was closely connected with the political ideology of Japanese imperialism that tried to justify rule over East Asia, rejecting the Occident and emphasizing “the sameness of the Orient.” However, without doubt “the inversion of modern values” and “the rise of Oriental values” resulting from this narrative placed the inquiry and revival of “things Korean” in a different context from erstwhile ones.
The leaders of Munjang, Lee Byung-gi, Chung Ji-yong, and Lee Tae-joon made it a traditional magazine, putting “things Korean” on an equal semantic value to “things of the past” and “typical natural things.” They not only took a traditional attitude to “things Korean = the past = nature,” but raised the attitude up to the creative mind. The difference of how to revive “things Korean = the past = nature” was basically related to their differences of time consciousness. This study shows that their differences of time consciousness and revival are classified by “the epiphany” and “the nostalgia.” While “the epiphany” tries to realize the potentiality of forgotten and extinct things of the past by repeating past lives, “the nostalgia” tries to stand aloof from modern daily lives, participating in the aesthetic aura through an irresistible yearning for the past.
But in the attitude of Munjang toward “things Korean = the past = nature,” there appears in particular an ironical inversion to substitute superiority for incompetence. Not to speak of “the nostalgia” coming from the completion of ruling over nature, even “the epiphany” that the oppressed past intrudes upon the present can result in enlarging the scope of its identity in case it repeats in defense mechanism provided by self-duplication. Thus, such an enlargement of identity will serve as momentum to integrate “things Korean” into a larger scope, “Oriental culture.”

목차

Modern “Crisis” and the Rise of Cultural Peculiarity
The World of “Nature = the Past = Things Korean”
Time Consciousness of Traditionalism
Traditionalism and Aestheticism
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-911-000955375