메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

Economic Analysis of Zero Energy Building in South Korea - focusing on Cost-Benefit analysis considering Social Cost -
Recommendations
Search
Questions

공사비 변화에 따른 제로에너지건축물 경제성 분석 - 사회적비용을 고려한 비용편익 분석을 중심으로 -

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Jae-Moon Kim (삼우씨엠건축사사무소)
Journal
ARCHITECTURAL INSTITUTE OF KOREA JOURNAL OF THE ARCHITECTURAL INSTITUTE OF KOREA Structure & Construction Vol.36 No.3(Wn.377) KCI Excellent Accredited Journal
Published
2020.3
Pages
147 - 157 (11page)

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
Economic Analysis of Zero Energy Building in South Korea - focusing on Cost-Benefit analysis considering Social Cost -
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Research history (2)

  • Are you curious about the follow-up research of this article?
  • You can check more advanced research results through related academic papers or academic presentations.
  • Check the research history of this article

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
With the increasing obligation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to the building sector, the government has been gradually expanding its obligation to zero-energy buildings since 2020. Since the ZEB certification took effect in 2017, 48 preliminary and main certifications have been completed as of March 2019, and most of them are public buildings or even certified, but have earned Grade 5 of ZEB. This means that compared with the number of annual building permits registered in Korea, the figure is insignificant, and that it receives little if not mandatory. Therefore, this study investigated empirical cases of ZEB additional construction cost and conducted cost benefit analysis according to changes in ZEB additional construction cost based on a preliminary feasibility analysis project recently conducted by the KDI. In addition, considering the public buildings, the social costs were considered, and the cost-benefit analysis method was the same as the KDI"s preliminary feasibility analysis method. The analysis shows that if the ratio of ZEB additional construction cost is more than 5 percent, it is analyzed that there is no economic feasibility, and considering that the ratio of additional construction cost in the cases of ZEB in Korea is 17 percent to 38 percent, it will not be easy to obtain ZEB certification in terms of cost. Finally, to narrow these differences in cost and economic aspects, the overseas low energy and ZEB incentive examples proposed measures such as the concept of subsidy payment in Illinois and the compensation of social costs to private ZEB.

Contents

Abstract
1. 서론
2. ZEB 문헌 및 선행연구 조사
3. 분석대상 선정
4. 대상 프로젝트 분석
5. 결론
REFERENCES

References (34)

Add References

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Frequently Viewed Together

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.