메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

Management of Gangneung Samaso and changes in the managing body
Recommendations
Search
Questions

강릉 사마소의 운영과 관리주체의 변동

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Lee, Sang-kyun (강릉원주대학교)
Journal
Korea Studies Adancement Center KOREAN STUDIES Vol.40 KCI Accredited Journals
Published
2019.11
Pages
225 - 254 (30page)

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
Management of Gangneung Samaso and changes in the managing body
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
There were Gyeryeonldang(桂蓮堂) of Samaso remains in the Gangneung. It is only samaso in the Gangwon-do. The period of making it was unknown but it was about 16C(Jung Jong (中宗) period) as finding sama-exam pass present condition. Originally it was established in a town of Okchen-dong and relocated Mt. Hwabu foot and was renovated. In 1766 Samadang was repaired and the name was Yeonhaengdang(讌杏堂) in 1810. Although past system was reformed in 1894(Kabo reform) descendant had a purpose of maintaining it and the name was Gyeryeonldang in 1907. Moseongye which was organized by descendant extensively repaired the Gyeryeondang from 1933 to 1935.
Samaso in Gangneung was managed by Samagy. There were no Samagy documents but main members were region gentry from successful candidate of sama-exam and many successful candidates in another region also participated in Samaso. Although the function of Samaso was nominal after Kabo reform(1894) members tried to guarantee vasted rights of property of samaso. In 1930 Samagy was noncommittal because Samaso in Gangneung was managed by Samagy. There were no Samagy documents but main members were region gentry from successful candidate of sama-exam and many successful candidates in another region also participated in Samaso. Although the function of Samaso was nominal after Kabo reform(1894) members tried to guarantee vasted rights of property of samaso. In 1930 Samagy was noncommittal because most members were dead and the dispute of property in Samaso was ended.
In order to maintaining the property in Samaso and recognizing as descendant, descendant organized Moseongye and participating in managing Samaso(region gentry association) in 1906. However, they did not participate in Samagy. In this situation, Samagy tried to sell property of coming down from Samaso and Moseongye opposed it. It was dispute about Samaso property between Samagy and Moseongye. Duspute continues until 1930, they had not been able to reach an agreement. As a result, most properties were sold by Samagy the dispute was ended. However, Moseongye increased property in order to maintain Samaso and bought the site of Gyeryeonldang. This means management authority of Samaso is Moseongye and their efforts made maintain historic meaning and status of remains of Samaso until now. However, the dispute between Samagy and Moseongye shows the severance of historic correlation between Samagy and Samaso.

Contents

요약
1. 머리말
2. 강릉 사마소의 연혁
3. 강릉 사마계의 운영상황
4. 일제강점기 사마소 관리주체의 변동
5. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract

References (24)

Add References

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-911-000351722