메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Hong Chen (Anhui University) Jianmin Sun (Anhui University)
저널정보
강원대학교 인문과학연구소 Journal of Humanities Therapy Journal of Humanities Therapy Vol.10 No.2
발행연도
2019.12
수록면
117 - 135 (19page)
DOI
10.33252/jht.2019.12.10.2.117

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper analyzes and studies the philosophical practice cases of university students in classrooms where teachers use Socratic dialogue and role-playing to help university students solve various problems they face. In the steps of philosophical practice, the rules of participants, consultants, bystanders and moderators are set up in advance. The moderator (usually a teacher) is responsible for guiding the topic. If there is still confusion and need help when the participants finish the dialogue, the moderator will give appropriate suggestions; the participants will state the confusion and problems they are facing according to their personal experience; the bystanders will record the dialogue of the participants by observing and listening to the participants, analyze and write down their observations and suggestions. According to these consulting rules, the effect of consulting is obvious. When the problems that university students talk about are also common in daily life, such as communication with their families, interpersonal relationships, learning problems, love affairs and other problems, they are easy to resonate and are more willing to express their innermost feelings. They said that the philosophical practice helped them a lot, let them overcome psychological obstacles, dare to express their true ideas, understand the core of their own problems, true ideas, understand the core of their own problems, and solve problems that had not been considered before. Some university students have learned critical analysis skills and used keen observation to analyze themselves in the course of philosophical dialogue. Of course, there are other university students who have not solved their own problems. As can be seen from the homework of university students, both participants and bystanders have come up with new ideas that have never been before.

목차

Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Socratic Dialogue Practice: Group Counseling
3. Role-playing Practice: Individual Counseling
4. The Typical Cases and Analysis of Philosophical Practice
5. The Effect of Philosophy Practice
6. The Characteristics of Philosophical Practice and Its Occurrence
References

참고문헌 (8)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-001-000281175