메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Leon de Haas (PlatoPractijk)
저널정보
강원대학교 인문과학연구소 Journal of Humanities Therapy Journal of Humanities Therapy Vol.6 No.1
발행연도
2015.6
수록면
131 - 156 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Philosophical practice is a historical and social phenomenon. As such it reflects and reproduces developments in the society which it is part of. In Western countries the post-industrial mass culture of the Self can be seen as a struggle with ‘nihilism’. Attempts to proclaim a philosophical therapy are both part of the culture of the Self, and, particularly, a sign of resistance against the loss of philosophical identity. In the context of the Industrial Revolution philosophy lost substantial crafts to the new sciences and humanities. In different ways, Husserl and Wittgenstein gave due consideration to that loss, and developed new practices of philosophy. Their paradigmatic innovations are known as the linguistic and phenomenological turns, the latter radicalized by Levinas. In this essay, the work of the three protagonists is called the ‘Open Senses’ paradigm. After World War II this paradigmatic revolution has been ignored, or at least debunked. Peter Raabe’s book on philosophical therapy is discussed as a present-day example of restorative philosophy in the field of philosophical practice.

목차

Abstract
1. Introduction
2. The Problem of the Philosopher’s Identity and Market Position
3. Restorative Trends Contemporary Philosophy
4. The Paradigmatic Revolution in 20th Century Western Philosophy
5. Negligence of the Paradigmatic Revolution
6. Raabe’s Justification of Philosophical Therapy
7. Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-001-000619787