메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background and Objectives This study aims to evaluate that usefulness of the endoscopicear surgery (EES) through the systematic review. Subjects and Method We searched literatures in literature databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE,Cochrane Library, etc.). Inclusion criteria is 1) studies of patients with chronic otitismedia, otitis media with effusion, cholesteatoma, conductive hearing loss, mixed hearing lossetc. 2) studies in which a transcanal endoscopic surgery was performed; and 3) studies inwhich one or more of the appropriate medical outcomes have been reported. We excluded that1) non-human studies and pre-clinical studies; 2) non-original articles, for example, non-systematicreviews; editorial, letter and opinion pieces; 3) research not published in Korean andEnglish; and 4) grey literature. Finally, 65 articles were selected and those results were analyzed. Results The safety of the EES was reported in 61 articles. Some studies reported damagedfacial nerve or perilymph gusher but these are the complications that can arise due to the characteristicsof the disease and not due to the EES and other reported complications were ofsimilar or lower level in the intervention group rather than the microscopy group. The effectivenessof the EES was reported in 23 articles. The EES tended to show improved effects interms of graft uptake status, cholesteatoma removal, and hearing improvement although effectiveoutcomes of most studies reported no significant difference between EES and microscopicear surgery. Conclusion EES is a safe and effective technique and as it is less invasive than the microscopicear surgery.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (80)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0