메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

Poetry, Art and Death: On the Ontological Relationship between the Anticipation of Death and Everydayness
Recommendations
Search

시, 예술, 그리고 죽음 : 죽음의 선구성과 일상성의 존재론적 관계에 대한 성찰

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Journal
Heidegger-Gesellschaft In Korea 현대유럽철학연구 현대유럽철학연구 제53호 KCI Accredited Journals
Published
2019.1
Pages
271 - 300 (30page)

Usage

cover
Poetry, Art and Death: On the Ontological Relationship between the Anticipation of Death and Everydayness
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
The main idea of this paper is that Heidegger’s later philosophy after the socalled ‘turn’(Kehre) should be regarded as an endeavour to develop an ontological analysis of the authentic historicity of Dasein’s being. Many Heideggereans believe that Heidegger’s major work Being and Time failed to explain the meaning of the authentic historicity of Dasein’s being. In fact, it is true that Being and Time does not deliver detailed explanations about the authentic historicity of Dasein’s being. But we should not forget that Being and Time mainly concentrate on the analysis of everydayness as an fundamental mode of Dasein’s being. Of course, in Being and Time Heidegger refers to Dasein’s anticipation of his own death as an ontological possibility to recover his authentic self, too. But it is only a brief background information which aims to help readers understand that Dasein is an fundamentally historical being. According to Being and Time, everydayness is a mode of historicity, namely an unauthentic historicity. And art and poetry, understood ontologically, are the revelation of Dasein’s possibility of recovering the authentic historicity of his ownmost being. Heidegger’s later philosophy shows us clearly that art and poetry are based on Dasein’s possibility to take over his own death authentically. This means, of course, that Heidegger’s distinction between authenticity and inauthenticity in Being and Time still stands in his later philosophy, too. And we should not overlook that understanding Dasein’s possibility to take over his own death authentically requires an ontological analysis of existential structures of Dasein’s being, which is carried out in Being and Time.

Contents

No content found

References (0)

Add References

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.