메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한안과학회 Korean Journal of Ophthalmology Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 제33권 제4호
발행연도
2019.1
수록면
333 - 342 (10page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: To compare the effects of bifocal versus trifocal diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) implantation on visualquality after phacoemulsification in patients with cataracts. Methods: Eighty-eight eyes from 63 patients were analyzed. Trifocal (AT LISA tri 839MP), bifocal (AcrySof IQReSTOR) and bifocal (Tecnis MF ZLB00) IOLs were implanted into 53, 18, and 17 eyes, respectively. Uncorrecteddistance, intermediate and near visual acuity, refractive errors, contrast sensitivity, and patient satisfactionwere measured at 1 week and 1 month after surgery. Refractive error was converted to a spherical equivalentand compared to predicted refraction calculated by IOL calculation formulas. Results: Uncorrected distance, intermediate, and near visual acuity did not differ significantly between groups. One month after surgery, the mean refractive errors were -0.07 diopters (D) in the AT LISA tri 839MP group,+0.18 D in the AcrySof IQ ReSTOR group, and +0.31 D in the Tecnis MF ZLB00 group (p < 0.001). The predictiveaccuracy of IOL calculation formulas did not differ between groups. Contrast sensitivity, satisfaction, andspectacle independence in the trifocal group were comparable with those of the two bifocal groups. Conclusions: Trifocal IOL and two different types of bifocal IOL implantation were all effective for improving visualquality, although refractive error in patients with trifocal IOL shows myopic tendencies.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (35)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0