지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The United States amended the Marine Mammal Protection Act(MMPA) and promulgated the rules for the implementation of Fish and Fish Product Import Provisions(August 15th, 2016), which became effective on January 1, 2017. With the entry into force of this regulation, fish and processed fish product caught by fisheries that did not have a comparability finding by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration(NOAA) until 2021 will be completely prohibited from exporting to the US. Korea is exporting the third largest number of fish products to the US after Japan and China, and if current export items are classified as export fisheries and that cannot be exported, it will inevitably ignite a huge damage.
The various forms of trade control measures adopted by the United States under the current MMPA could be deemed as the most powerful form of import ban. In particular, it seems that it could possibly violate the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea(1982) and the WTO Agreement in the sense that it restricts imports of the legally harvested tuna from longline fisheries in the high seas that are regulated and implemented in accordance with the Convention and Conservation and Management Measures adopted by regional fisheries management organizations(RFMOs) under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. In this context, in Chapter Ⅱ, the legal issue is whether the US MMPA on legally harvested tuna in the Convention area of the regional fisheries management organization constitute an extraterritorial application of US domestic law. And also, to consider the precedents of EU and US extraterritorial application of domestic legal regulations to deter IUU fishing respectively.
In Chapter III, it examines whether the extraterritorial application of MMPA against longline tuna fisheries in high seas can be legitimate in view of the "Objective Territoriality Principle" that applies to cases where certain actions occur outside the territory but the results affect the territory.
In the second part of Chapter III, it considers whether the complete ban on imports of fish and fish products derived from the longline tuna fisheries according to the MMPA is the violation under the WTO Agreement. In particular, it refers the case of EU’s seal product regulation which was brought by Canada and Norway against EU in WTO Dispute Settlement Body. Rulings and reasoning from the case will be applied to our facts to consider whether the MMPA’s regulation meets the standards in GATT Article XX.
The various forms of trade control measures adopted by the United States under the current MMPA could be deemed as the most powerful form of import ban. In particular, it seems that it could possibly violate the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea(1982) and the WTO Agreement in the sense that it restricts imports of the legally harvested tuna from longline fisheries in the high seas that are regulated and implemented in accordance with the Convention and Conservation and Management Measures adopted by regional fisheries management organizations(RFMOs) under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. In this context, in Chapter Ⅱ, the legal issue is whether the US MMPA on legally harvested tuna in the Convention area of the regional fisheries management organization constitute an extraterritorial application of US domestic law. And also, to consider the precedents of EU and US extraterritorial application of domestic legal regulations to deter IUU fishing respectively.
In Chapter III, it examines whether the extraterritorial application of MMPA against longline tuna fisheries in high seas can be legitimate in view of the "Objective Territoriality Principle" that applies to cases where certain actions occur outside the territory but the results affect the territory.
In the second part of Chapter III, it considers whether the complete ban on imports of fish and fish products derived from the longline tuna fisheries according to the MMPA is the violation under the WTO Agreement. In particular, it refers the case of EU’s seal product regulation which was brought by Canada and Norway against EU in WTO Dispute Settlement Body. Rulings and reasoning from the case will be applied to our facts to consider whether the MMPA’s regulation meets the standards in GATT Article XX.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 합법적 공해 다랑어 조업 및 미국, EU 국내법의 역외적용
Ⅲ. 미 해양포유류보호법의 객관적 속지주의와 수입규제에 대한 국제법상 쟁점
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (60)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
해양포유류보호법(MMPA) 대비 수산물 수출 유망시장 분석에 관한 연구
수산해양교육연구
2025 .02
-
미국의 해양포유류 혼획 어업 생산물 수입금지 조치에 따른 대응 방안 연구
해양정책연구
2016 .12
-
동북아 수역의 신 어업질서 성립과 향후 과제
해양정책연구
2018 .12
-
The status of the Korean distant water fisheries and the resource management of regional fisheries management organizations
한국수산과학회 양식분과 학술대회
2021 .04
-
주요 수입 수산물이 국내산 수산물 가격에 미치는 영향 분석
해양정책연구
2021 .06
-
International community’s efforts to mitigate sea turtle bycatch and status of implementing relevant measures by Korean tuna longline fishery
Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
2022 .12
-
미국 IUU 수산물 수입통제제도의 문제점과 시사점
해양정책연구
2018 .12
-
Evaluation of Korean distant water tuna fisheries in the Indian Ocean using ecosystem-based fishery risk assessment
한국수산과학회 양식분과 학술대회
2021 .04
-
Fisheries Science, For the Next 100 Years With 100 Years of the Knowledge and Experience
한국수산과학회 양식분과 학술대회
2021 .04
-
태평양 수역 우리나라 다랑어선망어업의 어획특성
수산해양기술연구
2015 .01
-
Fisheries research for achieving UN’s sustainable development goal 14
한국수산과학회 양식분과 학술대회
2021 .04
-
우리나라 고등수산교육에 관한 사적 고찰
수산해양교육연구
2020 .10
-
중ㆍ일 어업협정에 따른 양국 어업질서의 이행 실태 진단
수산해양교육연구
2015 .08
-
An analysis of the effects of Japan’s nuclear power plant accident on Korean consumers’ response to imported food consumption
Korean Journal of Agricultural Science
2017 .12
-
유엔 지속가능발전 목표(SDG)를 위한 수산연구 현황과 대응방향
수산해양교육연구
2018 .04
-
Women’s participation in fisheries management in small-scale fisheries in the Philippines
한국수산과학회 양식분과 학술대회
2020 .07
-
조선시대 수산 기록에 대한 과학계량적 분석 : 조선왕조실록을 중심으로
해양정책연구
2018 .06
-
우리나라 수산학교육의 역사와 미래방향
수산해양교육연구
2021 .10
-
어업관리수단으로서의 어업권제도의 의의와 개편 필요성
수산해양교육연구
2021 .02
-
제11차 각료회의 이후 WTO 수산보조금 협상 동향과 전망 - CPTPP와 USMCA의 수산보조금 비교 연구를 중심으로 -
해양정책연구
2020 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0