메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박수진 (농촌진흥청) 채혜성 (농촌진흥청)
저널정보
한국지역사회생활과학회 한국지역사회생활과학회지 한국지역사회생활과학회지 제30권 제3호
발행연도
2019.8
수록면
445 - 466 (22page)
DOI
10.7856/kjcls.2019.30.3.445

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (3)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
It is necessary to improve the public perception that can empathize the conservation of agricultural heritage and to promote related activities. Well-developed education programs will be contributory. The purpose of this study is to derive implications for developing an agricultural heritage education program based on ESD. Case studies were conducted to achieve these objectives. Examples are ‘YESDO’ of the Jeonju Council for Sustainable Development (Jeonju Council) and the ‘Teachers Research Society for GESD (GESD)’ of Gwangju Council for Sustainable Development (Gwangju Council). There are 5 key ESD-related phrases for case analysis: ① community-based, ② self-directed learning, ③ project teaching, ④ networking, and ⑤ participation by future generations. These key phrases are related to the operating system features of the 96 programs certified by the UNESCO Korea Committee for ESD Official Project. The results of analyzing the cases based on these five key phrases are as follows. In both cases, local students were looking for ways to investigate and analyze local problems and then solve them. As a result of the project to solve the local problems, the “Youth Participation Budget System (YESDO)” and “Creating Green Neighborhood (GESD)” were developed into actual policy projects. While GESD established the ESD committee centered on the Gwangju Council, YESDO was not well organized or well utilized. The YESDO planned activities involved middle and high school students, but middle school students did not participate in actual activities. GESD’s plan includes elementary school students and young people, but it was not easy to recruit middle school students. Based on the results of the case analysis, implications for the development of agricultural heritage education program were derived as follows. First, develop an agricultural heritage education program run by local residents and based on the theme of local issues. Second, students themselves ‘problem-solving type’ educational programs that concern the problems, causes, and solutions for the local community. Third, the project will be promoted as a project to encourage the understanding and participation of the public on an agricultural heritage. Fourth, partnerships between various stakeholders in the community and interregional networks listed in the KIAHS should all be considered. Fifth, this plan should be first implemented in the schools located in the area listed in KIAHS, and then the education model should spread nationwide.

목차

ABSTRACT
I. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
Ⅲ. 연구방법
Ⅳ. 결과 및 고찰
Ⅴ. 요약 및 결론
References

참고문헌 (27)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0