메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국임상약학회 한국임상약학회지 한국임상약학회지 제25권 제1호
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
9 - 17 (9page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background: Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) extend the treatment choices for rheumatoid arthritispatients with insufficient response or intolerance to conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs). These agents have considerable efficacycompared with conventional DMARDs, but only a few head-to-head comparisons among these agents have been performed. Theobjective of this systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the relative efficacy of Certolizumab withconventional DMARD to licensed bDMARD with cDMARD therapy for patients who failed to prior cDMARD treatment under thecondition of the reimbursement coverage criteria in Korea. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE andCochrane library. Key endpoints were the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) responses of 20/50/70 at six months. Bayesianoutcomes were calculated as median of treatment effect, probability of the best, Odds Ratio (OR) and probability that OR wasgreater than one. Results: Compared with other bDMARDs, Certolizumab were associated with higher or comparable ACR responserates; in ACR20, the OR (probability of OR>1) was 2.08 (92.6%) for Adalimumab, 1.86 (85.7%) for Etanercept, 1.89 (79.5%) forGolimumab, 2.36 (92.1%) for Infliximab, 1.79 (87.0%) for Abatacept, 1.74 (80.8%) for Rituximab and 1.82 (86.8%) for Tocilizaumab. InACR50 and ACR70, the ORs did not present significant differences. Conclusion: Certolizaumab with cDMARD was more effective orcomparable than other bDMARDs in patients who failed prior cDMARD treatment.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (21)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0