메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
국제한국어교육학회 한국어 교육 한국어 교육 제21권 제4호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
361 - 391 (31page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Many studies have emphasized that grammatical terminology is of little consequence in the communicative or proficiency-oriented classroom because the aim of communicative teaching is to promote interaction in the target language. However, recently, a partially opposing argument has been raised that grammatical terminology has an important role to play in classroom discourse. This paper investigates these issues by surveying learner's cognition and teacher's views on the use of Korean grammatical terminology. Depending on surveying, teachers hardly use grammatical terminology and avoid the situations where they introduce grammatical terminology. However, teacher tend to use grammatical terms in their classroom more often than is perceived. On the other hand, Korean learners respond positively to the teacher's usage of these terms. They thought that the use of terminology might benefit their understanding of grammar. Learners were more aware of grammatical terms than teachers assumed. Therefore Korean teachers may utilize terminology in a way that is beneficial to their students. However, they need to set limit in the use of terminology i.e. basic terminology. This may be determined according to the degree of necessity when the teacher teaches grammar or talks about grammar. Learner's familiarity with grammatical terminology should be a criterion for deciding the basic terminology. (Yonsei University)

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (22)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0