메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국환경영향평가학회 환경영향평가 환경영향평가 제16권 제2호
발행연도
2007.1
수록면
129 - 141 (13page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
With its more than 35 years of experience with EIA of NEPA in United States, the extensiveknowledge base of EIA could be the most suitable place for initial field of HIA to explorelessons available for. However, caution is needed as the technical differences in analysis,different policy context, and distinct professional culture between EIA and HIA might be. Thesuccesse of EIA of NEPA is the integration of environmental goals into decision makingprocess, improved planning, and increased transparency and public involvement, whereasshortcomings of it were defined as the excessive volume and complexity of EIA documents, thelimited and adversarial public involvement, the procedural process (not substantive), focus onprojects (not on policies and programs), and the limited consideration of health impacts.Integrating HIA into existing EIA process is positive in two reasons that the human health isclosely related with natural environment and EIA process is a fully established process thateffectively cuts across bureaucratic and sectoral boundaries. Also, integrating of HIA into EIAmight be a way with least resistance for the widespread use. A freestanding HIA separatedfrom EIA is desirable in terms of excessive volume of EIA documents and the procedural andlegal focus of EIA. It is needed to develop the formulated methodologies for advancing HIAwhether it is a part of or separated from EIA, and to estimate the potential values of HIA in thesubstantial society context. When possible, HIA should be established on the ways that EIAshave been used successfully.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (22)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0