메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국형사법학회 형사법연구 형사법연구 제24호
발행연도
2005.1
수록면
121 - 144 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The meaning of paying in using telephone card of defered payment system through theft and the unfair use of convenient facilitiesRyu, Seok-Junebecause the payment exists. This is excessive conclusion, regarding the meaning of the legal context. But other man's payment that can be equally estimated at criminal's payment should not be excluded. This precedent, however is diferent form it. So criminal's payment can not be approved.In this case, because the use of card by criminal was neglected for a long time, private law liability of card owner can be acknowledged. But losing card is not able to be estimated in testimony of giving the right of representation, even if representation without right is admitted, ratification of card owner doesn't exist. Furthermore during the period when card owner didn't recognize los of card, liability of owner should not be accepted, so the problem of pseudo representation needs not to be discussed. And in this period, card owner didn't even recognize the duty of payment, therefore denying the payment is appropriate. In this point, this precedent's decision is injustice. This precedent decided that judgement of payment should be estimated when a bill is asked for. This rises serious problem in the legal stability, so it shouldn't accepted.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0