메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국형사법학회 형사법연구 형사법연구 제21권 제2호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
99 - 120 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
It is necessary to look in depth at method that is used as evidence to regulate ability of evidence more strictly according to the peculiarity of deposition of codefendant. First, to use deposition in the court of codefendant, in the case of confederate who is in confederate relationship that is not recognized in eligibility of witness and in the case when confession in court and enough cross examination had been carried out, confessed deposition is recognized ability of evidence. Therefore, in these cases, it is not necessary to question as witness. But when codefendant's assertions are different from each other, most of them are confederates. However, if assertions are very different from each other, it is possible to question after making an oath as witness when there is voluntary application of codefendant and separated truthful pleading to find truthful entity exceptionally. Also codefendant who is not in relationship as confederate is in a position as the 3rd person and one should be a witness who should recognize as qualification of witness. At this point, it is not impossible to separate pleading. However, it is considered to avoid unnecessary steps as seeing Zeugenvernehmung (examination of a witnesses) in the same lawsuit. In addition, as using pleading out of court of codefendant, court should give ability of evidence when adequate cases like confession as requisite of Article 312 Clause 4 of Revised Criminal Procedure Act and in case of police confession as requisite of Article 312 Clause 4 of the same Act.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (27)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0