지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Korean businesses, and their legal representatives, have observed the improvements of enforcement of commercial judgments through arbitration over traditional collections litigation in U.S. Courts‐‐‐due to quicker proceedings, exceptional cost savings and more predictable outcomes‐‐‐in attaching assets within U.S. jurisdictions. But how are the 2016 interim measures implemented by the Arbitration Act of Korea utilized to avoid jurisdictional and procedure pitfalls of enforcement proceedings in the Federal Courts of the United States? Authors examine the necessary prerequisites of the U.S. Federal Arbitration Act as adopted through the New York Convention, to which Korea and the U.S. are signatories, as distinguished from the Panama Convention. Five common U.S. arbitration institutions address U.S. “domestic” disputes, preempting U.S. state law arbitrations, while this article focuses on U.S. enforcement of “international” arbitration awards. Seeking U.S. recognition and enforcement of Korean arbitral awards necessitates avoiding common defenses involving due process, public policy or documentary formality challenges. Provisional and conservatory injunctive relief measures are explored. A variety of U.S. cases involving Korean litigants are examined to illustrate the legal challenges involving non‐domestic arbitral awards, foreign arbitral awards and injunctive relief. Suggestions aimed toward further research are focused on typical Korean business needs such as motions to confirm foreign arbitration awards, enforce such awards or motions to compel arbitration.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (22)
참고문헌 신청
/ / McDonald v. City of West Branch, Mich., 466 U.S. 284, 104 S.Ct. 1799, 80 L.Ed.2d 302
/ 1958 / The Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, United Nations
/ 1971 / The U.S. Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws, § 98, § 117
/ 1974 / Scherk v. Alberto?Culver Co., 417 U.S. 506, 94 S.Ct. 2449, 41 L.Ed.2d 270 (1974)
/ 1980 / Allen v. McCurry, 449 U.S. 90, 94, 101 S.Ct. 411, 414, 66 L.Ed.2d 308
/ 1958 / The Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, United Nations
/ 1971 / The U.S. Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws, § 98, § 117
/ 1974 / Scherk v. Alberto?Culver Co., 417 U.S. 506, 94 S.Ct. 2449, 41 L.Ed.2d 270 (1974)
/ 1980 / Allen v. McCurry, 449 U.S. 90, 94, 101 S.Ct. 411, 414, 66 L.Ed.2d 308
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards under England Arbitration Act
중재연구
2021 .09
-
The Provisions on the Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards in Indonesia (under the New York Convention of 1958?)
중재연구
2017 .01
-
Interim Measures in Arbitration and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in Korea and China
중재연구
2016 .01
-
The Significance of the Language of Arbitration Agreements – Focusing on the recent U.S. court's decision denying confirmation of arbitral award in Spineway SA v. Strategos Group LLC
중재연구
2024 .09
-
중국 중재제도의 새로운 발전과 외국중재판정 승인 및 집행에 관한 연구
중재연구
2015 .01
-
외국중재판정의 승인 및 집행에 관한 중국의 실행
법학연구
2019 .08
-
The Finality of Arbitral Awards: The U.S. Practices
중재연구
2020 .09
-
독일민사소송법상 외국중재판정의 승인 및 집행- ｢독일민사소송법｣ 제1061조를 중심으로 -
중재연구
2019 .01
-
Enforcement of Arbitral Awards Incompatible with the Korean Procedural Framework
중재연구
2020 .09
-
국제상거래 분쟁 해결을 위한 중재판정의 승인과 집행에 관한 연구
관세학회지
2024 .12
-
베트남 법체계에 있어서 외국중재판정 승인 및 집행
중재연구
2021 .03
-
The Challenge of Arbitral Awards in Pakistan
중재연구
2017 .01
-
Korean case analysis of compelling arbitration in the United States
중재연구
2018 .01
-
중재 활성화를 위한 중재비용 구조제도의도입 방안 연구 - 민사소송법상 소송구조에 착안하여 -
중재연구
2024 .03
-
Scrutiny of Arbitral Awards by Arbitration Institutions in International Arbitration: Focusing on the ICC’s Scrutiny of Award Process
법과정책
2017 .08
-
한국 중재산업 발전 방안
중재연구
2018 .01
-
2016년 개정 중재법의 중재판정 집행에 관한 문제점
중재연구
2016 .01
-
在中国法视角下研究仲裁裁决的效力 - 以仲裁裁决的实质效力为中心
국제법무
2016 .05
-
The Language of Arbitration Agreements and Availability of Class Arbitration: Focusing on the U.S. Supreme Court's Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela Decision
중재연구
2021 .09
-
A Study on the Amended Arbitration Law of Mongolia
중재연구
2017 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0