메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국경영법률학회 경영법률 경영법률 제18권 제4호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
133 - 171 (39page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In recent years the corporate lawyers in Korea have discussed enthusiastically the issue on the introduction of the american executive officer system in their Commercial Code Book. But until now they don't have any clear result on that. The american officer system has developed in the wave of the improving the failed corporate board. Nowadays we cannot see any serious 'management' in terms of the operating daily businesses at a corporate board. Instead of this the corporate boards oversee the managements and they give indirect advice to them. So the senior executives are operating the daily business in almost every public corporation in U.S. From a perspective of the internal control, the separation between the management and the board is very important. A good governance requests probably also it. But at the same time we should bear in mind that the efficiency of the business has the same weight in a good corporate governance. Dimma says, "corporate governance is a process, not a result. It is and must always be a means, never an end. The end is improved corporate performance and return to investors."(Dimma, Exellence in the Boardroom, p. 73). And the reality in a daily corporate life in U.S. shows that the CEO and the chairman of the board are usually combined to one person. So the individual company should decide the combination or the separation of both ; it belongs principally to a freedom of every corporation to choose the governance structure.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (37)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0