메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국중앙영어영문학회 영어영문학연구 영어영문학연구 제52권 제3호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
315 - 337 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Korean distinguishes two types of verbal conjunctions: tensed and tenseless. Among these two types, tensed verbal conjunction has been considered IP-level coordination since the tense marker appears in both conjuncts. Tenseless verbal conjunction, on the other hand, has been considered VP-level coordination since the tense marker appears only in the final conjunct, and it is suggested that the tense and negation in the final conjunct has their scope over both conjuncts (e.g. Yoon 1994). However, tenseless verbal conjunction is divided into sequential and non-sequential conjunctions, and more recent research (e.g. Kwon 2004; Cho 2005) has shown that sequential and non-sequential conjunctions have different syntactic structures. In this paper, it is shown that the behaviors of sequential and non-sequential conjunctions are different not only syntactically but also semantically, especially with respect to the interpretation of tense and negation in the final conjunct; unlike the initial conjunct of non-sequential tenseless conjunction, the initial conjunct of sequential conjunction (ICSC) is out of the scope of the tense and negation in the final conjunct. This difference in relation to tense and negation, thus, provides additional support for the claim that the two types of conjunctions have different syntactic structures, i.e. ICSC is an adverbial adjunct.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (12)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0