메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국근대영미소설학회 근대영미소설 근대영미소설 제11권 제1호
발행연도
2004.1
수록면
5 - 27 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Colonialism in Aphra Behn does not appear to invite another discussion, as so many critics have pointed out the limits and fissures, racist attitude, and royalist allegory in Behn’s novella and plays. However, they have not given enough justice to the fact that her novellas and plays should be placed in the historical context of the late 17th century attitude towards colony, slavery, and ‘other’ races and civilizations. Against the mainstream of the 17th century’s expansionism and mercantilism, Behn’s Oroonoko and The Widow Ranter depict other races like native Americans and African slaves as unfortunate heroes(or heroines) with dignity and noble hearts. While Behn seems to endorse the slavery and the mode of production based on slave trade and slave labor, her works also displays inconsistency, leading to an embryo of satire of British colonialism. Behn depicts British colonialists as mavericks, ruffians or runaway criminals who duplicate or reproduce the corruption and cruelty of the British society. They are not so decent as native Americans or the black prince. They are much more evil and cruel creatures than Indians or Africans. Even though Behn makes her characters mere stereotypes, she does not show any sympathy towards those white colonizers. It’s fairly easy to point out Behn’s racist, colonialist attitude. However, it also should be remembered that the boundary of colonialism is not so easy to cross, and that the progress toward post-colonial awareness is a long, tiring, and sometimes complicated one.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (20)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0