메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국18세기영문학회 18세기영문학 18세기영문학 제4권 제1호
발행연도
2007.1
수록면
23 - 37 (15page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Between History and Fiction: Aphra Behn’s Love Letters and Daniel Defoe’s Journal of the Plague Year Kang Yl Ko (Yonsei University) While seeking affinity between Aphra Behn’s and Daniel Defoe’s works may seem irrelevant, Behn’s Love Letters and Defoe’s Journal in fact betray the same generic ambiguities in oscillating between history and fiction. Behn’s Love Letters is based on concrete historical facts and written from the author’s clearly pro-Tory perspective. Behn was one of the practitioners of early modern English historiography informed by the Baconian view that “history should be useful.” However, Love Letters discloses traits of fiction too, within the tradition of romance that idealizes characters and lacks verisimilitude of plot. In its fusion of history and fiction, Defoe’s Journal is not different from Behn’s Love Letters. The Journal has historical accuracy in details such as specific characters and anecdotes. Yet, such factual details serve to expose the fictiveness of the narrator’s self-identification. Furthermore, given its serious investment in the narrator’s spiritual reconciliation, the Journal cannot be read as a pure historical writing. In brief, Behn’s and Defoe’s works reflect the contradictory requirement of the era when history and fiction penetrated reciprocally.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (17)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0