메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국제임스조이스학회 제임스조이스 저널 제임스조이스 저널 제11권 제1호
발행연도
2005.1
수록면
91 - 106 (16page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The modern criticism finds the author absent from the text. It follows that they dethrone the author as the creator in favor of its function: T. S. Eliot proposes the impersonality theory, M. Foucault the author-function, and R. Barthes the death of the author. It is also true of James Joyce. He supposes the author to be a ghost, "one who has faded into impalpability through death, through absence." Since it is conceived "upon incertitude, upon unlikelihood," the relation between the author and its characters is discarded as "a legal fiction." The author as a final signified, what was granted by the classical criticism, is deferred towards its absence. But detected as the deferment may be, a more important thing that should not be overlooked is that the trace of the author as an originating subject cannot be erased. His person, his history, his tastes, his passions still furnish the reader with the authorial presence. As Stephen states in the person of Joyce, "[the author] passes on towards eternity in undiminished personality." This discrepancies originate from Joyce's own idea of reality. His cosmos features inclusiveness of such discrepancies, which appears to be founded "upon incertitude, upon unlikelihood." Like "the hornmad Iago ceaselessly willing that the moor in him shall suffer," Joyce's author can be conceived as "all in all," an entelechy.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (7)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0