메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국영어학학회 영어학연구 영어학연구 제23권 제3호
발행연도
2017.1
수록면
81 - 100 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
It is predictable that the uses of English modal auxiliaries by English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners differ from those by English as a Native Language (ENL) speakers. Following the studies in Deshors (2010) and Deshors & Gries (2014), Yoon and Lee (2016) adopted a corpus-based method and examined the uses of these two modal auxiliaries can and may by ENL speakers and Korean EFL learners. Utilizing the same corpus data used in Yoon and Lee (2016), this study investigates where the discrepancies were originated. This paper takes a random forest analysis and calculates the variable importance of each linguistic factor in the corpus data of each group. The analysis reveals which factors play a crucial role in the determination of alternations in each group. Through the analysis, the followings were observed: (i) Sense (deontic vs. epistemic vs. dynamic) played the most important role in the determination of can vs. may in both groups of speakers, (ii) Vendler’s classification, subject morpheme type, verb semantics, and animate type (of the subject) played essential roles in ENL speakers’ group, (iii) Subject person, subject morpheme type, animate type, and clause type played critical roles in Korean EFL learners’ group, and (iv) Korean EFL learners gave more importance to sense, subject morpheme type, animate type, and subject person whereas ENL speakers gave more importance to Vendler’s classification.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (29)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0