상호주판단의 기준시점 및 기준일제도와의 상호연관성  -대상판결 : 대법원 2009. 1. 30. 선고 2006다31269 판결 -

김홍기

추천

검색

자료유형: 학술저널

저자정보: 김홍기

저널정보: 전북대학교 동북아법연구소 동북아법연구 동북아법연구 제3권 제2호

발행연도: 2009.1

수록면: 481 - 508 (28page)

이용수

📌

연구주제

📖

연구배경

🔬

연구방법

🏆

연구결과

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기

Cross-ownership is a method of reinforcing business relationships by owning stock in the companies with which a given company does business. Cross-ownership results when a company owns shares of another company that already holds shares of the company. The vices of cross-ownership include the fictitious increase of capital of the corporation, the control by the incumbent directors without any contribution, and the enhancement of concentration of economic power. Almost every country adapts some regulations over cross-ownership by prohibiting cross-ownership or eliminating the voting rights of cross-owned shares. Record date established by an issuer of a security for the purpose of determining the holders who are entitled to receive a dividend or distribution. Record date also may be established for entitlement to vote or to receive notice of meeting. If such a record date has been fixed, the corporation must prepare a list of shareholders entitled to vote as of such record date. Only a shareholder whose name appears on such list of shareholders is entitled by law to vote. Transferees of shares acquired prior to the meeting but whose name does not appear on the shareholder list will no longer be entitled by law to vote, even if they produce evidence of ownership in timely fashion prior to the meeting. This article examines function and roles of the cross-ownership and its relationship with record date by reviewing the case rendered on Jan. 30, 2009 in Supreme Court of Korea (Supreme Court of Korea 2009. 1. 30. 2006da31269 Judgement). Especially this article focus on the meaning of cross-ownership and its relationship with record date in Korean judicial system. This article is organized in four parts. Part Ⅰoverview the general legal issues which will be raised in next sections. Part Ⅱ described the general description of the Case. Part Ⅲ examines the functions and roles of the cross-ownership and its relationship with record date in the meaning of Korean laws, especially when is the time whether the shares subsidiary have falls under meaning of cross-ownership under the article 369(3) of Korean Commercia Act. Part Ⅳ provides the comprehensive analysis to the case and the direction for the relationship between cross-ownership and record date in Korea.

Cross-ownership is a method of reinforcing business relationships by owning stock in the companies with which a given company does business. Cross-ownership results when a company owns shares of another company that already holds shares of the company. The vices of cross-ownership include the fictitious increase of capital of the corporation, the control by the incumbent directors without any contribution, and the enhancement of concentration of economic power. Almost every country adapts some regulations over cross-ownership by prohibiting cross-ownership or eliminating the voting rights of cross-owned shares. Record date established by an issuer of a security for the purpose of determining the holders who are entitled to receive a dividend or distribution. Record date also may be established for entitlement to vote or to receive notice of meeting. If such a record date has been fixed, the corporation must prepare a list of shareholders entitled to vote as of such record date. Only a shareholder whose name appears on such list of shareholders is entitled by law to vote. Transferees of shares acquired prior to the meeting but whose name does not appear on the shareholder list will no longer be entitled by law to vote, even if they produce evidence of ownership in timely fashion prior to the meeting. This article examines function and roles of the cross-ownership and its relationship with record date by reviewing the case rendered on Jan. 30, 2009 in Supreme Court of Korea (Supreme Court of Korea 2009. 1. 30. 2006da31269 Judgement). Especially this article focus on the meaning of cross-ownership and its relationship with record date in Korean judicial system. This article is organized in four parts. Part Ⅰoverview the general legal issues which will be raised in next sections. Part Ⅱ described the general description of the Case. Part Ⅲ examines the functions and roles of the cross-ownership and its relationship with record date in the meaning of Korean laws, especially when is the time whether the shares subsidiary have falls under meaning of cross-ownership under the article 369(3) of Korean Commercia Act. Part Ⅳ provides the comprehensive analysis to the case and the direction for the relationship between cross-ownership and record date in Korea.

#주식상호보유 #상호주 #의결권 #기준일 #주주총회일 #명의개서 #상법 제369조 제3항 #대법원 2006다31269 판결 #서울고등법원 2005나74384 판결 #Cross-ownership #Record Date #Date of General Shareholders' Meeting #Article 369 #3) of Commercial Act #Supreme Court of Korea 2006da31269 Judgement #Seoul Hight Court 2005na74384 Judgement

참고문헌 (22)

참고문헌 신청

Alicia Flarity / 2009 / David Slays Coliath: The Fight Against the FCC's Recent Relaxation of the Newspaper-Broadcast Cross-ownership Rule / Baylor L. Rev. 61 : 261 ~

Bernard Black / 1996 / A Self-Enforcing Model of Corporate Law / Harv. L. Rev. 109 : 1911 ~

David Pritchard / 2008 / One Owner, One Voice? Testing a Central Premise of Newspaper-Broadcast Cross-ownership Policy / Comm. L. & Pol'y 13 : 1 ~

Lorna H. Veraldi / 1996 / Carpooling on the Information Superhighway: The Case for Newspaper-Television Cross-Ownership / St. Thomas L. Rev. 8 : 349 ~

Ministry of Government Services Policy Branch / 2006 / Business Law Modernization Consultation Phase Ⅱ

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

김홍기

소속기관 전북대학교 동북아법연구소

주요연구분야 사회과학 > 법학

논문수 1 이용수 8

최근 본 자료

전체보기

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
AI 학습용 데이터	원문	원문 PDF 파일
AI 학습용 데이터	원문 + 메타 (기본/상세)	원문 PDF 파일 및 서지정보 CSV
대량 구매용 데이터	B2B 구독 방식	특정 자료 한정으로 원문 접근 권한 부여
대량 구매용 데이터	URL 전달 방식	바로 PDF 뷰어를 열람할 수 있는 URL 제공

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
AI 학습용 데이터	기본 메타	발행기관명, 간행물명, 권호명, 권(vol), 호(issue), 통권, 발행연도, 발행월, 논문명, 저자명, 시작페이지, 종료페이지, 전체페이지, 상세페이지URL
상세 메타 데이터	발행기관 메타	발행기관 이명, 영문명, 창립연도, 홈페이지URL, 발행기관 소개
	간행물 메타	부제목, 간행물 유형, ISSN, ISBN, 최초발행연도, 폐간연도, 간행빈도, 발행주기, 등재사항, 이용수, 피인용수, 권호수, 논문수, 표지이미지
	논문 메타	작성 언어, 부제목, 대등제목, 목차, 키워드, 초록, 이미지, 참고문헌, 이용수, 피인용수, 논문활용도, DBpia통합주제분류, KDC분류, DDC분류, 한국연구재단분류, UCI, DOI
	저자 메타	소속기관, 소속부서, 직급, 연구분야, 연구키워드, 이용수, 피인용수, 저자 논문활용도

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
※ 결합형/맞춤형 메타 데이터는 신청 내용에 따라 다양하게 제공 가능
이용순위 정보	주제분야별 많이 이용된 논문	“인문학”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	이용기관별 많이 이용된 논문	“중고등학교”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	세부기관별 많이 이용된 논문	“서울대학교”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	키워드별 많이 이용된 논문	“Chat GPT”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
키워드 정보	많이 이용된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 이용된 키워드
	많이 발행된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 발행된 키워드
	많이 검색된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 검색된 키워드
	연구 트렌드 키워드	특정 키워드 연관 연구동향 분석 데이터 키워드

논문 기본 정보

초록· 키워드

AI 요약

연구주제

연구배경

연구방법

연구결과

주요내용

목차

참고문헌 (22)

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

댓글(0)