메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
중앙대학교 법학연구원 法學論文集 法學論文集 제33권 제2호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
47 - 84 (38page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
It is obvious that the transition process of the former socialist system can’t be sustained without the support of appropriate legal institutions. In the article, I trace the development of the PRC’s legal and judicial system since the beginning of its “reform and opening” policy. First, I characterize the Chinese model as “gradual” change of legal institutions, and compare it with the German model. Then, I research various statutes in each legal area classified as constitutional and administrative laws, civil and commercial laws, criminal and socio-economic laws, and the judicial system. And I find out below “macro-dynamic” tendencies. 1. The change of legal institutions generally comes after economic reform. 2. The legislative act(the general rule) comes after long-term accumulation of administrative orders(legal experiments). 3. The change of legal institutions sometimes comes later/earlier than expected, and it makes gaps between law and markets. 4. The change of legal institutions is sometimes not accompanied with the proper supply of the related mental resources, especially in judicial system. The Chinese “gradual” development model is a reflection of its national “size and complexity”, so it can’t be literally applied to the Korean situation. But the Chinese model can afford “buffer” stages to the people, and such merit should not be underestimated.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0