메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국비교공법학회 공법학연구 공법학연구 제6권 제2호
발행연도
2005.6
수록면
225 - 256 (32page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Both Japan and Korea have been quite active on judicial reform in recent years. With respect to legal education, both countries have been taking substantial reform measures, modeling after the American law school system. Considering the prevailing attitude and culture of the legal profession between these two Asian countries and the United States, it is not surprising that a quite significant number of lawyers and legal scholars in Japan and Korea are sceptical about the new reform measures on legal education. Japanese launched the law school reform first, although Korea initiated such project a few more years earlier. Korea, now expecting to open the new law school in 2008, needs to carefully examine the on-going experiment in Japan. This paper is written to accomplish this purpose.
In this paper, the author describes the initial process of the Japanese legal education reform, as well as the current situation after introducing the American style law school in 2004. While describing the major features of the reform measures, the authors highlights and discusses many points that seem quite relevant and educational to the Korean legal education reform. One of the basic premises of this paper is a strong belief in the free market system. The author argues that all the participants in the reform activities should not forget the principle of the judicial reform, which is providing better legal service to the public. Not this basic principle, but the self-serving group interest of the legal profession, however, has been prevailing in the Korean reform. The Korean Bar Association has been insisting on limiting the annual quota of new lawyers. The author tries to point out the fallacy of the argument, and suggests that any system that restricting healthy competition among law schools dooms to failure.

목차

Ⅰ. 서설
Ⅱ. 사법제도개혁의 추진과정과 개혁의 방향
Ⅲ. 법과대학원 제도의 시행
Ⅳ. 일본 법과대학원 제도의 특징 및 장ㆍ단점
Ⅴ. 결어
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-362-016081465