메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
고려대학교 역사연구소 史叢(사총) 史叢(사총) 제70호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
29 - 58 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Jeong Gyo argued that Chen Shou considered Shu to be the authentic successor, via analyzing the content of his San Guo Zhi, a text that was known to be edited from the aspect that Wei is the authentic one. Although it is true that there are sufficient difficulties to understand Chen Shou as the one who had the theory of Shu the authentic successor straightly as Jeong Gyo had argued, his argument may be significant in that he sought to connoted meanings rather than general forms and in that his basis presented re-thinking of intentions of historians shown in books of history. Also, in the developing process of his argument, Jeong Gyo confessed his own position that Shu was the authentic successor. His authentic theory may be affected by Zi Zhi Tong Jian Gang Mu by Zhu Xi mostly, and Zhu’s historical view affected Jeong Gyo’s writing of Nam Myeong Gang Mok. Nam Myeong Gang Mok is a book of history in which the history of South Ming government was written with Gang Mok style. Since the 18th century, books of history dealing with history of South Ming on the basis of authentic theory had been published resulting from the notion on Sinocentrism succession, and Nam Myeong Gang Mok was one of the products of the notion. Jeong Gyo wrote the history of South Ming, claiming that Chosun, not Ching, authentically succeeded to Ming Dynasty. In the appeal for accession to the throne of the Korean King when Korea’s sovereignty was threatened by Tragedy in UI-mi year and Go-jong’s refuge to Russian Mission in 1896, Jeong’s perception of history was expressed as concrete perception of reality. The thought that Chinese and Barbarians were divided not by tribes or regions but by culture was the outcome of the notion on Sinocentrism succession, the accession to the throne was a ritual that Korea is the center of Sinocentrism. Jeong’s appeal for accession to the throne of the Korean King was a concrete expression of “New Confucianism” and “Eastern morality and Western technology” requiring acceptance of Western reality based on Eastern values among intellectuals who sought to Western values and other intellectuals who sought to Eastern values.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (10)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0