메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
원광대학교 법학연구소 원광법학 원광법학 제25권 제4호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
95 - 115 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
There exists a clear limitation in understanding Hobbes' legal theory just by reading 「Leviathan」, because it just presents abstract legal propositions in the context of his political theory. Although 「Dialogue」, which was a late writing of Hobbes, has been little known to legal scholarship, it fully shows his legal doctrine regarding reason, sovereignty and courts. Therefore, to understand the historical and philosophical background of English law(common law) in the early modern period, it is necessary to read 「Dialogue」. In 「Dialogue」, Hobbes reveals the apparent tension between medieval philosophy and modern one as he did in 「Leviathan」. However, he also tries to mitigate it by mixing natural law theory and positive law theory in the argument on law. For establishing a coherent legal theory, he systematizes these conflicting concepts of law by locating King's sovereignty in the middle of them. That means because King of England receives the sovereignty by social contract and the law of nature, he is able to make law and the positive law should be respected by people. In sum, in order to make the people obey the sovereign, Hobbes focuses on reflections of the relation between reason and law depending on complicated legal doctrines.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (20)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0