메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
서울대학교 미국학연구소 미국학 미국학 제32권 제1호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
199 - 247 (49page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The nature and the number of cases reviewed and decided by a nation's highest court bear direct relevance to the symbolic and practical function of such court in that nation's separation of powers structure and, in a larger context, the nation's constitutional, political and social domain as a whole. Issues pertaining to the size of plenary docket of the nation's highest court should be analyzed first in terms of the court's institutional capacity and of the quality of the work. The crucial question here is whether the court's workload is manageable while the quality of both the process and the outcome of the court's work can be maintained at the highest caliber. More significantly, the nature and the number of cases reviewed and decided by the nation's highest court should be analyzed from the standpoint of whether they suffice for the appropriate degree of symbolic and actual control that the highest court has over the lower courts, for such control signifies the integrity and consistency of the nation's law, judicial behavior and justice administration, and the public's predictability thereto. Public trust in the fairness and legitimacy of the judiciary and the administration of justice in many parts stems from such predictability. Thus, the nature of the cases of the nation's highest court and the size of such court's plenary docket are directly relevant to the question of how the nation's judiciary can administer justice and implement the ultimate constitutional values based upon the trust therein from the embers of the national community, hence, should be studied in this vein. Extensive discussions are currently on the way in South Korea with respect to its Supreme Court's workload and the allocation of human resources thereto. The possibility of letting the South Korean Supreme Court select with discretion the cases it will review and decide and the appropriate size of the Supreme Court's plenary docket have much been discussed, and certain legislations and systems have newly been introduced in order to relieve the massive workload of the Supreme Court, such as the appellate review process performed by the appellate division within the High Courts that sit under the Supreme Court. The experience of the U.S. Supreme Court indicates that, for any conducive discussion upon institutional changes for reaching and maintaining the appropriate number of cases to be reviewed and decided by the nation's highest court, a thorough analysis of the elements and factors both inside and outside the court and the judiciary that affect the nature and the number of cases reaching the nation's highest court, extending from the judicial appointment mechanism and the political and moral values of individual justices to the specific means of filing an appeal to the highest court and the amount of discretion given to the court in selecting the cases to be reviewed on the merit, should precede. Such elements and factors should be analyzed from as various perspectives as possible and practicable to wards the pertinent society as a whole, as well as the law and the legal system therein.
#미연방대법원 #상고심관할 #상고 청구 #본안심리사건수 #적정 본안심리사건수 #U.S. Supreme Court #appellate jurisdiction #writ of certiorari #size of plenary ocket #appropriate size of plenary docket

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청
Baum, Lawrence / 1993 / Case Selection and Decisionmaking in the U.S. Supreme Court / Law and Society Review 27 (2) : 443 ~ 459 google schola Baum, Lawrence / 2006 / The Supreme Court / CQ Press google schola Baum, Lawrence / 2007 / American Courts: Process and Policy / Wadsworth Publishing google schola Baum, Lawrence / 2008 / Judges and Their Audiences: a Perspective on Jurical Behavior / Princeton University Press google schola Black, Ryan and Christina Boyd / / Litigant Status and Agenda Setting on the U.S. Supreme Court (paper presented at the annual meeting of the The Law and Society Association, May 27, google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0