메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국국방연구원 The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis 제20권 제3호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
187 - 198 (12page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
It is evident that conflict management differs from nation to nation and region to region, and the fact that this variation creates problems in dealing with economic disputes and political conflicts is even more painfully realized. The way in which national and regional differences affect negotiations and conflict management has intrigued scholars for decades. It is apparent that there are regional differences, as well as national ones in some cases. However, the norm when looking at conflict management and the success thereof has unfortunately been the Western model and standards of interaction; a mode that is not always applicable to all regions. One of the regions that have claimed to be different is East Asia, and in particular Southeast Asia, with its so-called ‘‘Asian Way.’’ This article will focus on possible emerging structures in East Asia and its sub-regions for conflict management in the security sector and, if they exist, how they work. It will not deal with the ‘‘Asian Way’’ as a concept, but instead simply analyze whether there are regional structures or characteristics that could form regional conflict management structures. The scope of the article will be limited to the Northeast Asian and Southeast Asian region, here collectively called East Asia.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (35)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0