메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국사학사학회 韓國史學史學報 韓國史學史學報 제17호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
153 - 182 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper aims to trace those changes that has occurred in the Japanese modern historiography in relation to the perception of the characteristics of British history from 1945 until today. In Japanese academic circle there exists a tradition in which the British state and British history were seen as ‘the symbol of modernity’. Especially Ōtsuka Hisao(大塚久雄) and his school, the ‘After War historiography(Sengo Sigaku, 戦後史学)’ in succession to Fukuzawa Yukichi(福沢諭吉)'s vision of ‘the symbol of civilization’, saw Britain as a model which Japan would have to imitate in her pursuit of modernization. Consequently the study of the British history occupied a certain privileged status in the Ōtsuka school because its students thought the historical research in Japan must serve to construct modern democratic society after the defeat of World War Ⅱ. For the Ōtsuka school the study of British history essentially required to transcend the so called Japan's ‘distorted modernity’ and to attain ‘normal modernity’ which they believed were embodied in the British history. However, if we historicize the ‘Sengo Sigaku’ from the post-modern perspective, Ōtsuka's special interests in the British history was nothing but an effort to find out the modern democratic subjects who would voluntarily devote their body and soul to the cause of nation state. In the 1970s a revisionist school, called ‘Re-appraisal Group(Saigento-ha, 再検討派)’ began to attack the Ōtsuka school on the ground that its understanding of world history followed the universal historical law. The group broke up with the Ōtsuka school, saying that the essence of historical knowledge lies not in universality but in particularity. Since the emergence of the group, the position of the British history in Japan changed from ‘a criterion history’ into ‘a history of a region’. Kawakita Minou(川北稔), one of the leading historians among the group, focused on gentlemen as ruling elites in the British society, instead of independent yeomanry who were considered as the pivotal class in charge of capitalization within the Ōtsuka school. There was a remarkable increase in the number of articles and books published in the field of British history since 1990. The imperial history project made by ‘the Japanese Association for the Study of British Imperial and Commonwealth History(イギリス帝国史研究会)’ is especially worth mentioning. The reason for the fruitfulness of imperial history lies in the fact that the British empire held a hegemonic position in the world capitalist system from the end of 18th century till the early 20th century. In a certain sense, the rise of imperial history and global history means the return of the Ōtsuka school's perspective towards the world history, even though not exactly the same. The global history perspective today tries to deconstruct national boundaries and reconstruct them into trans-national history. Thus, the image of Britain is deviated from ‘the symbol of modernity’ and turns to diversity in the studies of social history and imperial history. The paper tries to draw attention to the recent developments as such in Japanese historiography now under way.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (39)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0