메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한말연구학회 한말연구 한말연구 제48호
발행연도
2018.1
수록면
161 - 185 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This research aimed at describing the characteristic difference by comparing Saseo-eonhae, published in the 16th century and Saseoyulgok-eonhae, published in the 18th century. This research grasped the regular pattern of conflicting aspect between the above two documents. This research investigated and described the characteristic trends between such expressions by comparing them with each other. The aspects can be classified as follows. Phrases involved with ‘di’, phrases involved with ‘-O-’, phrases realized with ‘-gi’, phrases involved with ‘ᄒᆞ다’, characteristic in the adnominal composition, replacement of ending. Among them, ‘di’ phrases, ‘-O-’ phrases can be said to be most characteristic. In 󰡔Saseo-eonhae󰡕, phrases realized with end ending and coupling ending appeared, while in Saseoyulgok-eonhae, phrases involved with ‘di’ appeared. That’s similar to ‘-ㄹ+디+-니라’, which can be determined with a structure of one meaning according to the opinion, or can be diachronically analyzed that bound noun ‘di’ was used along with the adnominal ending. In modern Korean language, also, ‘-ㄴ 것’, ‘-ㄹ 것’ structures display the aspects of manner, since the medium words are considered as the same context with the structural cognition of syntax. On the other hand, a difference in the interposition of ‘-O-’ was confirmed. In Saseoyulgok-eonhae, more ‘-O-’ appeared. However, ‘-O-’ was less used in the adnominal composition. On the contrary, there were phrases were only ‘-O-’ disappeared, while others were substituted with other composition as ‘-O-’ disappeared.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0