메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background: Currently there is no noninvasive imaging modality used to risk stratify patients requiring lead extractions. Wereport the novel use of superior vena cava (SVC) echocardiography to identify lead fibrosis and complex cardiac implantableelectronic device (CIED) lead extraction. With an aging population and expanding indications for cardiac device implantation,the ability to deal with the complications associated with chronically implanted device has also increased. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of Doppler echocardiography recorded in our outpatient Electrophysiology/DeviceClinic office over 6 months. Images from 109 consecutive patients were reviewed. Results: 62% (68/109) did not have a CIED and 38% (41/109) had a CIED. In patients without a CIED, 6% (4/68) displayedturbulent color flow by Doppler in the SVC, while 22% (9/41) of patients with a CIED displayed turbulent flow. Fisher’s exacttest found a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p value < 0.05). The CIED group was subdivided into 2groups based on device implant duration (< 2 years vs. ≥ 2 years). Of the CIED implanted for ≥ 2 years, 27% (9/33) hadturbulent flow in the SVC by Doppler, while no patients (0/8) with implant durations < 2 years demonstrated turbulent flow. Nine patients underwent subsequent lead extraction. A turbulent color pattern successfully identified all 3 patients that hadsignificant fibrosis in the SVC found during extraction. Conclusion: Our data suggests that assessing turbulent flow using color Doppler in the SVC may be a valuable noninvasivescreening tool prior to lead extraction in predicting complex procedures.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (21)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0