메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background and Purpose Te aim of this study was to determine the face and criterionvalidity, stability reliability, and internal consistency of the Persian version of the Impact onParticipation and Autonomy (IPA-p) scale among Iranian people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods Trained experts interviewed 364 MS patients and their relatives to assess the criterion validity, stability reliability, and internal consistency of the IPA-p scale. Ten specialistsfrom diferent disciplines were also recruited to assess its face validity. A consent form wascompleted by the patients and their relatives. Internal consistency reliability was measuredusing Cronbach’s alpha and stability reliability was assessed using interclass correlation coeffcients (ICCs). Te test-retest method was used to detect the reliability of the questioner. Testudy subjects completed the IPA-p scale on two occasions separated by an interval of 30–45days. Study checklists were also used to assess the face validity, stability reliability, and internal consistency of the IPA-p scale. Results About 50% of the respondents reported their perceived overall participation to be“good” or “very good” and 60% of the specialists rated the ability of the IPA-p scale to measure what it was designed for as “excellent.” Spearman correlation coefcients were >0.8 forall but one IPA-p domain. Cronbach’s alpha between the mean IPA-p scale scores achievedon two separate occasions ranged from 0.858 to 0.913. Te highest and lowest internal consistencies belonged to the “social relationships” and “education and learning” domains, respectively. Te test-retest ICCs for the nine domains were between 0.789 and 0.919, and allwere signifcant at p<0.001. Conclusions Te IPA-p questionnaire can be considered a valid and reliable instrument forassessing self-reported participation among Iranian MS patients.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0