메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국멀티미디어언어교육학회 멀티미디어 언어교육 멀티미디어 언어교육 제19권 제2호
발행연도
2016.1
수록면
34 - 60 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study compared metalinguistic and exemplar-based written corrective feedback (CF) for their effects on Korean university students’ grammatical accuracy improvement regarding English verb complementation errors. This study was conducted in a writing class where two types of multimedia components were used for writing instruction: mini-lessons based on PowerPoint slides and a movie. This study also investigated how learners perceived the CF they received. Fifty-two learners, divided into two groups (i.e., metalinguistic and exemplar), participated in this class for 10 weeks. A sentence completion test and a narrative writing test were administered to measure learners’ verb complementation knowledge before and after the treatment. In the treatment sessions, learners were given a mini-lesson on English verb complementation using PowerPoint slides, watched part of a Korean movie, and then wrote a summary of the given movie part. Learners received either of the two types of CF on their written errors. This treatment procedure lasted for eight weeks. The results revealed that both feedback types were beneficial. Learners in both groups significantly improved their verb complementation knowledge. Though no significant difference between both groups was found, more learners preferred exemplar-based to metalinguistic CF.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (59)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0