지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문
- 저자정보
- 지도교수
- 조영우
- 발행연도
- 2015
- 저작권
- 배재대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
이용수0
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The present study investigated which type of written corrective feedback is more effective for Korean university students to improve their grammatical accuracy involving English verb complementation errors: metalinguistic feedback or exemplar-based written corrective feedback. This study also investigated how the learners perceived the feedback they received on their errors. Metalinguistic feedback provided learners with some form of explicit comments on verb complementation. In contrast, exemplar-based feedback gave students some examples of verb complementation so that learners may infer grammatical rules without explanations. This study was conducted in a regular TESOL major course as a special project to improve students’ grammatical accuracy in writing. Fifty-two students were divided into two groups: metalinguistic feedback group and exemplar-based feedback group. A sentence completion test and a narrative writing test were administered to measure the learners’ verb complementation knowledge before and after the treatment (pre- and post-test). For the treatment sessions, the learners watched part of a Korean movie, and were given brief information about the target verbs and their complementation options, and then were asked to write a summary of the movie part they just watched. The students were given corrective feedback on their writings depending on the group they belonged to. This procedure lasted for eight weeks. The results revealed that both feedback types were beneficial. Students in both groups significantly improved their verb complementation knowledge. Though there was no significant difference between both, more learners preferred exemplar-based feedback to metalinguistic feedback.
목차
Table of ContentsAbstract ⅰTable of Contents ⅱList of Tables ⅴI. Introduction 1Ⅱ. Literature review 3A. The effectiveness of written corrective feedback 3B. Direct versus indirect corrective feedback 4C. Types of direct written corrective feedback 61. Metalinguistic Explanation 62. Exemplar-based written corrective feedback 8D. Purpose of Research 8Ⅲ. Methodology 10A. Participants and Context of Research 10B. Target from: Verb Complementation 10C. Materials 101. Instructional Materials 102. Testing Materials 111) Sentence Completion Test 112) Narrative Writing Test 123) Questionnaire 12D. Written corrective feedback treatment procedures 12E. Analysis 131. Test Reliability 14Ⅳ. Results & Discussion 15A. Metalinguistic feedback for English grammatical accuracy 151. Sentence Completion Test 152. Narrative Essay Writing Test 15B. Exemplar-based feedback for English grammatical accuracy 161. Sentence Completion Test 162. Narrative Essay Writing Test 17C. Metalinguistic vs. exemplar-based? 18D. L2 learners perceptions of benefits of two types of feedback 19E. Discussion 20Ⅴ. Conclusion 23A. Implications 23B. Suggestions for Future Research 23References 25Appendix 32
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0