급성뇌경색 환자에서 국내 신경과 전문의의 정맥내 헤파린 투여 사용 실태

성영희

추천

검색

자료유형: 학술저널

저자정보: 성영희

저널정보: 대한뇌졸중학회 대한뇌졸중학회지 대한뇌졸중학회지 제5권 제2호

발행연도: 2003.1

수록면: 151 - 156 (6page)

이용수

📌

연구주제

📖

연구배경

🔬

연구방법

🏆

연구결과

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기

Department of Neurology Hallym University College of Medicine Background and Purpose: The use of intravenous(IV) heparin in acute ischemic stroke has been an area of great controversy. We sought to get the current practice patterns of Korean board certificated neurologists(KBCN) with regard to heparin use in acute ischemic stroke. Methods: A survey was taken of 657 KBCNs. The e-mail address and subspecialty were obtained from both the History of Korean Neurological Association(1982-2002) and the directory of Korean Stroke Society. Brief vignettes were presented via electronic mailing system for the following five scenarios: progressive stroke, cardiogenic embolism, posterior circulation, external carotid artery stenosis, repetitive TIA. For each vignette respondents were asked whether they would use IV heparin with response choice such as 'yes', may be’and ‘no’. Results: Two hundred and thirty three (46.5%) KBCNs returned a completed survey. In progressive stroke, 157 respondents (67.4%) replied ‘yes’, 48 (20.6%) replied ‘maybe’, and 28(12.0%) would not use I.V. heparin. In cardiogenic embolism, 169 respondents (72.5%) replied that they would use, 46 (19.7%) replied maybe, and 18(7.7%) would not use I.V. heparin. In posterior circulation stroke, 122 respondents (52.4%) would use I.V. heparin, 60 (25.8%) maybe use, 51(21.9%) would not use I.V. heparin. In ECA stenosis, 104 respondents (44.6%) would use, 70 (30.0%) maybe use, and 59 (25.3%) would not use I.V. heparin. In repetitive TIA, 173 respondents (74.2%) would use, 29 (12.4%) maybe use, and 31 (13.3%) would not use I.V. heparin. The usage pattern of I.V. heparin in each vignette was not affected by age, current teaching status and subspecialty of stroke. Compared to results found in American study in 2001, KCBNs were significantly more likely to use IV heparin in four clinical scenarios, except in cardiogenic embolism. Conclusion: Although most therapeutic guidelines for anticoagulants in acute ischemic stroke do not recommend IV heparin for any specific group of acute ischemic stroke that is based on any presumed stroke mechanism or location, Neurologists in Korea would use intravenous heparin in large numbers for these conditions.

Department of Neurology Hallym University College of Medicine Background and Purpose: The use of intravenous(IV) heparin in acute ischemic stroke has been an area of great controversy. We sought to get the current practice patterns of Korean board certificated neurologists(KBCN) with regard to heparin use in acute ischemic stroke. Methods: A survey was taken of 657 KBCNs. The e-mail address and subspecialty were obtained from both the History of Korean Neurological Association(1982-2002) and the directory of Korean Stroke Society. Brief vignettes were presented via electronic mailing system for the following five scenarios: progressive stroke, cardiogenic embolism, posterior circulation, external carotid artery stenosis, repetitive TIA. For each vignette respondents were asked whether they would use IV heparin with response choice such as 'yes', may be’and ‘no’. Results: Two hundred and thirty three (46.5%) KBCNs returned a completed survey. In progressive stroke, 157 respondents (67.4%) replied ‘yes’, 48 (20.6%) replied ‘maybe’, and 28(12.0%) would not use I.V. heparin. In cardiogenic embolism, 169 respondents (72.5%) replied that they would use, 46 (19.7%) replied maybe, and 18(7.7%) would not use I.V. heparin. In posterior circulation stroke, 122 respondents (52.4%) would use I.V. heparin, 60 (25.8%) maybe use, 51(21.9%) would not use I.V. heparin. In ECA stenosis, 104 respondents (44.6%) would use, 70 (30.0%) maybe use, and 59 (25.3%) would not use I.V. heparin. In repetitive TIA, 173 respondents (74.2%) would use, 29 (12.4%) maybe use, and 31 (13.3%) would not use I.V. heparin. The usage pattern of I.V. heparin in each vignette was not affected by age, current teaching status and subspecialty of stroke. Compared to results found in American study in 2001, KCBNs were significantly more likely to use IV heparin in four clinical scenarios, except in cardiogenic embolism. Conclusion: Although most therapeutic guidelines for anticoagulants in acute ischemic stroke do not recommend IV heparin for any specific group of acute ischemic stroke that is based on any presumed stroke mechanism or location, Neurologists in Korea would use intravenous heparin in large numbers for these conditions.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

참고문헌이 DBpia에서 서비스 중이라면, [참고문헌 신청]을 통해 등록해보세요

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

성영희

소속기관 대한뇌졸중학회

주요연구분야 의약학 > 임상의학 > 신경과학

논문수 2 이용수 13

최근 본 자료

전체보기

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
AI 학습용 데이터	원문	원문 PDF 파일
AI 학습용 데이터	원문 + 메타 (기본/상세)	원문 PDF 파일 및 서지정보 CSV
대량 구매용 데이터	B2B 구독 방식	특정 자료 한정으로 원문 접근 권한 부여
대량 구매용 데이터	URL 전달 방식	바로 PDF 뷰어를 열람할 수 있는 URL 제공

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
AI 학습용 데이터	기본 메타	발행기관명, 간행물명, 권호명, 권(vol), 호(issue), 통권, 발행연도, 발행월, 논문명, 저자명, 시작페이지, 종료페이지, 전체페이지, 상세페이지URL
상세 메타 데이터	발행기관 메타	발행기관 이명, 영문명, 창립연도, 홈페이지URL, 발행기관 소개
	간행물 메타	부제목, 간행물 유형, ISSN, ISBN, 최초발행연도, 폐간연도, 간행빈도, 발행주기, 등재사항, 이용수, 피인용수, 권호수, 논문수, 표지이미지
	논문 메타	작성 언어, 부제목, 대등제목, 목차, 키워드, 초록, 이미지, 참고문헌, 이용수, 피인용수, 논문활용도, DBpia통합주제분류, KDC분류, DDC분류, 한국연구재단분류, UCI, DOI
	저자 메타	소속기관, 소속부서, 직급, 연구분야, 연구키워드, 이용수, 피인용수, 저자 논문활용도

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
※ 결합형/맞춤형 메타 데이터는 신청 내용에 따라 다양하게 제공 가능
이용순위 정보	주제분야별 많이 이용된 논문	“인문학”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	이용기관별 많이 이용된 논문	“중고등학교”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	세부기관별 많이 이용된 논문	“서울대학교”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	키워드별 많이 이용된 논문	“Chat GPT”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
키워드 정보	많이 이용된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 이용된 키워드
	많이 발행된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 발행된 키워드
	많이 검색된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 검색된 키워드
	연구 트렌드 키워드	특정 키워드 연관 연구동향 분석 데이터 키워드

논문 기본 정보

초록· 키워드

AI 요약

연구주제

연구배경

연구방법

연구결과

주요내용

목차

참고문헌 (0)

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

댓글(0)