메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
21세기영어영문학회 영어영문학21 영어영문학21 제28권 제4호
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
443 - 464 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article aims to evaluate John Steinbeck’s ideas in his war propaganda literature in the 1940s and compare them with John Rawls’s political philosophy in The Law of Peoples. Until now, Steinbeck’s fictions and non-fictions joining the American war effort during the World War Ⅱ have been undervalued as being hasty, superficial, mechanical, abstract, and even unrealistic as a solemn sacrifice to the greater cause of patriotism. Nevertheless, the writer did not lose his old concepts and rather developed them into a kind of international pacifism. To demonstrate this opinion, the researchers observe the works—Sea of Cortez, The Moon Is Down, Bombs Away, Once There Was a War, Lifeboat, A Medal for Benny, and A Russian Journal. As a result, these works turn out to materialize Steinbeck’s previous ideas, and especially A Russian Journal is analogous to Rawls’s view in that the international society should respect the peoples’ diversity under the absolute value of human rights. That is, Steinbeck’s group-man idea assumes another bigger entity other than the sum of individuals in a community and non-teleology cherishes what it is rather than what it should be. Meanwhile, Rawls insists that there should be a consolidated norm among the peoples and all the societies should observe the duty of non-intervention. Lastly, this interdisciplinary research shows that Steinbeck’s literature of propaganda is not too cheap or worthless.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (38)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0