메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국복음주의신약학회 신약연구 신약연구 제16권 제1호
발행연도
2017.1
수록면
113 - 147 (35page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Scholarly debate about the nature of the Galatian crisis and Paul’s response thereof, continues without any sign of abating. I have offered my own view on these matters on many different occasions, and the following study is a kind of follow-up to them in view of more recent studies on the letter. Space precludes any detailed report on the recent trends in Galatian scholarship. My intention in this paper is much simpler: to review scholarly discussion on those issues for which I have offered my own, often idiosyncratic, opinions. A few scholars refer to my work either favorably or disapprovingly, and these will naturally take up some of my attention in the paper. The first section deals with the nature of justification. After briefly commenting on the sociologically oriented trend of the NPP which stands in contrast to the soteriological reading of the traditional perspective, the study critically discusses the revisionistic reading of N. T. Wright who redefines justification in a non-soteriological way. The next section discusses the justification as the object of future hope, which is one of the author’s major contentions. After introducing those who have responded to my proposal favorably, the study critically engages with them pointing out the exegetical, logical problems caused by their mixing the futuristic reading with the notion of present justification. The third section examines the two major trends of interpretation of the ‘works of the law’, the key concept in reconstructing the Galatian crisis. The study points out that both lines of interpretation depend on assumptions which cannot be ascertained either historically or exegetically. Then, the study focuses on the comprehensive interpretation of the concept which is common to both sides, exposing the rhetorical and practical problems such a view creates. The forth section examines 6:12-13 and 5:3, two most important passages in determining the nature of the Galatian crisis. The study argues that the notion of a ‘law-observant mission’ cannot be drawn from what Paul explicitly says in these places. This leads to the idea of the unity of the Torah, an important assumption which leads scholars to read the ‘works of the law’ comprehensively. Major sources often presented in support of the view in James and Justin Martyr and Paul’s own discussion of the matter will be examined with the conclusion that the idea of the unity of the law cannot be used to back up a law-observant mission in Galatia. On the basis of the foregoing discussions, the study concludes that the crisis in Galatia is not a doctrinal one caused by the effort to keep the law as a whole but one of religious hypocrisy in which the zeal for outward marks of identity is not accompanied by what Paul considers to be the essence of Christian life, namely, life in the Spirit.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (34)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0