지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The study of this thesis is a review and analysis of Professor
Francis X. Clooney’s comparative theology about Theology after
Ved nt. He introduce and develop the comparative study between the
Indian theology of Ved nta as a school of Uttra M m ms Sutra and
one of the main thoughts of Christian theology. He provided a
preliminary formulation of many comparative theological fields.
Clooney insists on emphasizing the theological character of Ved nta
philosophy of Advaita(non-dualism). And as an inclusive perspective
he introduce a Christian theological text of Thomas Aquinas to
compare with the text of Sankara’s commentary on the Veda along
with the exegesis of Amal nanda.
Clooney develops his own interpretation of the Advaita/Sankara
tradition, using as background his previous studies of Indian philosophy
as an Roman Catholic theologian. His theological approach is
characterized by a hermeneutical level between the two texts or traditions.
Especially at an empirical or descriptive level, his interpretation
of his Advaita and Christian texts will give a new insight of theological
study.
Clooney’s Ved nta theology is the result of reinterpretation about
V e d nt philosophy in the theological point of view. His view is
proceeded by three points of view as follows: First, it is a study of that
Indian system of exegetical theology known as the Advaita Ved nta.
Second, his comparative study is rethought and rewritten after a close
reading of Advaita. Third, his work explores the tension between the
study of Advaita and the construction of a Christian comparative
theology mediated by a reflective reappropriation of reading.
The methods of his comparative theology can be divided as three
kinds of comparison. First, calling comparison “theological”. Second,
calling theology “comparative”. Third, comparative theology in
relation to other disciplines. Clooney use all these methods properly to
compare two texts as practical knowledge. He deals with a practical
comparative parallel reading of two texts as follows: The composition
of the text for comparative theology/ Reading the Summa Theologiae
and the Uttara M m m s S t r a together. The setting of the comparison
of these texts is a rereading Summa Theologiae I.13.4 after
UMS III.3.11-13. These texts talks about the God and Brahman
especially for the point of naming God or Brahman. After reading the
these two text, Clooney find a few similarities and differences and
also persue some strategies for the practice of reading Amal n a n d a
and Aquinas together. Finally, Coolney suggest that after reading
these two texts, the reader would get a new vision of comparative
theology. we com-parative theologian or non-theologian also need to
accept patiently his suggestive richness and variety of comparative
models which can be generated out of specific exercises.
After comparative reading of these two text, we can analysis the
similarity between the thought of Amal nanda and Aquinas. these two
‘theologians’ have attach importance to “the words” as an aspect of
instrumental method reaching the “ultimate Reality”, the God.
Amal nanda’s the other point of emphasis is about the relation of the
meaning of words. For example, even though we can not define the
Brhman in a word, we can expand the width of ‘relation of the
meaning of words.’ Aquinas’ view also can be compare to this
Amal nanda’s point of view in his own belief-system. Another point
of the common ground of these two theologians is about finding the
divine perfectness in a relation between the creator and creature. There
are also differ-ences between these two theologian’s views except
these similarities. Among the differences, the most particular point is
the logical defect as Clooney has indicated. “If these two theologian
insist that even though the “name” is inappropriate to the “Reality, the
God”, the “name” is useful, their insist is not firm.”
Nevertheless, if we accept that these two theologians search for the
way of “ultimate Reality” or “divine perfection” on the basis of same
orientation, we can have a deep silent dialogue beyond language
through the “words”. After all Clooney’s purpose of comparative
reading is to find “the others” for the new horizon of cognizance. But
comparative theology is just a starting point of reading text, not a final
definition. Therefore Clooney’s suggestion is an example of dialogue
between the Hindu and Christian. Through his comparative reading
method, we can have an eye of ‘the third text reading’ beyond the
similarity and difference of theological language. As an awakening
theologian, comparative scholar can make a new progress through the
comparative reading and dialogue with “the other” religious text.
The study of this thesis is a review and analysis of Professor Francis X. Clooney’s comparative theology about Theology after Ved nt. He introduce and develop the comparative study between the Indian theology of Ved nta as a school of Uttra M m ms Sutra and one of the main thoughts of Christian theology. He provided a preliminary formulation of many comparative theological fields. Clooney insists on emphasizing the theological character of Ved nta philosophy of Advaita(non-dualism). And as an inclusive perspective he introduce a Christian theological text of Thomas Aquinas to compare with the text of Sankara’s commentary on the Veda along with the exegesis of Amal nanda. Clooney develops his own interpretation of the Advaita/Sankara tradition, using as background his previous studies of Indian philosophy as an Roman Catholic theologian. His theological approach is characterized by a hermeneutical level between the two texts or traditions. Especially at an empirical or descriptive level, his interpretation of his Advaita and Christian texts will give a new insight of theological study. Clooney’s Ved nta theology is the result of reinterpretation about V e d nt philosophy in the theological point of view. His view is proceeded by three points of view as follows: First, it is a study of that Indian system of exegetical theology known as the Advaita Ved nta. Second, his comparative study is rethought and rewritten after a close reading of Advaita. Third, his work explores the tension between the study of Advaita and the construction of a Christian comparative theology mediated by a reflective reappropriation of reading. The methods of his comparative theology can be divided as three kinds of comparison. First, calling comparison “theological”. Second, calling theology “comparative”. Third, comparative theology in relation to other disciplines. Clooney use all these methods properly to compare two texts as practical knowledge. He deals with a practical comparative parallel reading of two texts as follows: The composition of the text for comparative theology/ Reading the Summa Theologiae and the Uttara M m m s S t r a together. The setting of the comparison of these texts is a rereading Summa Theologiae I.13.4 after UMS III.3.11-13. These texts talks about the God and Brahman especially for the point of naming God or Brahman. After reading the these two text, Clooney find a few similarities and differences and also persue some strategies for the practice of reading Amal n a n d a and Aquinas together. Finally, Coolney suggest that after reading these two texts, the reader would get a new vision of comparative theology. we com-parative theologian or non-theologian also need to accept patiently his suggestive richness and variety of comparative models which can be generated out of specific exercises. After comparative reading of these two text, we can analysis the similarity between the thought of Amal nanda and Aquinas. these two ‘theologians’ have attach importance to “the words” as an aspect of instrumental method reaching the “ultimate Reality”, the God. Amal nanda’s the other point of emphasis is about the relation of the meaning of words. For example, even though we can not define the Brhman in a word, we can expand the width of ‘relation of the meaning of words.’ Aquinas’ view also can be compare to this Amal nanda’s point of view in his own belief-system. Another point of the common ground of these two theologians is about finding the divine perfectness in a relation between the creator and creature. There are also differ-ences between these two theologian’s views except these similarities. Among the differences, the most particular point is the logical defect as Clooney has indicated. “If these two theologian insist that even though the “name” is inappropriate to the “Reality, the God”, the “name” is useful, their insist is not firm.” Nevertheless, if we accept that these two theologians search for the way of “ultimate Reality” or “divine perfection” on the basis of same orientation, we can have a deep silent dialogue beyond language through the “words”. After all Clooney’s purpose of comparative reading is to find “the others” for the new horizon of cognizance. But comparative theology is just a starting point of reading text, not a final definition. Therefore Clooney’s suggestion is an example of dialogue between the Hindu and Christian. Through his comparative reading method, we can have an eye of ‘the third text reading’ beyond the similarity and difference of theological language. As an awakening theologian, comparative scholar can make a new progress through the comparative reading and dialogue with “the other” religious text.
The study of this thesis is a review and analysis of Professor Francis X. Clooney’s comparative theology about Theology after Ved nt. He introduce and develop the comparative study between the Indian theology of Ved nta as a school of Uttra M m ms Sutra and one of the main thoughts of Christian theology. He provided a preliminary formulation of many comparative theological fields. Clooney insists on emphasizing the theological character of Ved nta philosophy of Advaita(non-dualism). And as an inclusive perspective he introduce a Christian theological text of Thomas Aquinas to compare with the text of Sankara’s commentary on the Veda along with the exegesis of Amal nanda. Clooney develops his own interpretation of the Advaita/Sankara tradition, using as background his previous studies of Indian philosophy as an Roman Catholic theologian. His theological approach is characterized by a hermeneutical level between the two texts or traditions. Especially at an empirical or descriptive level, his interpretation of his Advaita and Christian texts will give a new insight of theological study. Clooney’s Ved nta theology is the result of reinterpretation about V e d nt philosophy in the theological point of view. His view is proceeded by three points of view as follows: First, it is a study of that Indian system of exegetical theology known as the Advaita Ved nta. Second, his comparative study is rethought and rewritten after a close reading of Advaita. Third, his work explores the tension between the study of Advaita and the construction of a Christian comparative theology mediated by a reflective reappropriation of reading. The methods of his comparative theology can be divided as three kinds of comparison. First, calling comparison “theological”. Second, calling theology “comparative”. Third, comparative theology in relation to other disciplines. Clooney use all these methods properly to compare two texts as practical knowledge. He deals with a practical comparative parallel reading of two texts as follows: The composition of the text for comparative theology/ Reading the Summa Theologiae and the Uttara M m m s S t r a together. The setting of the comparison of these texts is a rereading Summa Theologiae I.13.4 after UMS III.3.11-13. These texts talks about the God and Brahman especially for the point of naming God or Brahman. After reading the these two text, Clooney find a few similarities and differences and also persue some strategies for the practice of reading Amal n a n d a and Aquinas together. Finally, Coolney suggest that after reading these two texts, the reader would get a new vision of comparative theology. we com-parative theologian or non-theologian also need to accept patiently his suggestive richness and variety of comparative models which can be generated out of specific exercises. After comparative reading of these two text, we can analysis the similarity between the thought of Amal nanda and Aquinas. these two ‘theologians’ have attach importance to “the words” as an aspect of instrumental method reaching the “ultimate Reality”, the God. Amal nanda’s the other point of emphasis is about the relation of the meaning of words. For example, even though we can not define the Brhman in a word, we can expand the width of ‘relation of the meaning of words.’ Aquinas’ view also can be compare to this Amal nanda’s point of view in his own belief-system. Another point of the common ground of these two theologians is about finding the divine perfectness in a relation between the creator and creature. There are also differ-ences between these two theologian’s views except these similarities. Among the differences, the most particular point is the logical defect as Clooney has indicated. “If these two theologian insist that even though the “name” is inappropriate to the “Reality, the God”, the “name” is useful, their insist is not firm.” Nevertheless, if we accept that these two theologians search for the way of “ultimate Reality” or “divine perfection” on the basis of same orientation, we can have a deep silent dialogue beyond language through the “words”. After all Clooney’s purpose of comparative reading is to find “the others” for the new horizon of cognizance. But comparative theology is just a starting point of reading text, not a final definition. Therefore Clooney’s suggestion is an example of dialogue between the Hindu and Christian. Through his comparative reading method, we can have an eye of ‘the third text reading’ beyond the similarity and difference of theological language. As an awakening theologian, comparative scholar can make a new progress through the comparative reading and dialogue with “the other” religious text.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (17)
참고문헌 신청
Aquinas, Thomas / 1963 / Summa Theologiae, Latin text and English translation / Blackfriars
Clooney, F. X. / 1993 / Theology After Ved nta: An Experiment in Comparative Theology / Sri Satguru Pub
Coward, Harold / 1993 / Hindu-Christian Dialogue; Perspective and Encounters / Motilal Banarsidass Pub.
Hick, John / 1987 / The Myth of Christian Uniqueness / Orbis
Hick, John / 1993 / The Metaphor of God Incarnate / Westerminster
Clooney, F. X. / 1993 / Theology After Ved nta: An Experiment in Comparative Theology / Sri Satguru Pub
Coward, Harold / 1993 / Hindu-Christian Dialogue; Perspective and Encounters / Motilal Banarsidass Pub.
Hick, John / 1987 / The Myth of Christian Uniqueness / Orbis
Hick, John / 1993 / The Metaphor of God Incarnate / Westerminster
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국적 신학 : 회고와 전망
한국기독교신학논총
2001 .10
-
세계신학의 흐름에서 본 한국 기독교윤리학 방법론에 대한 전망
한국기독교신학논총
2001 .10
-
Doing Theology as Educating : Theological Implications for Christian Education
한국기독교신학논총
2004 .05
-
한국 구약학의 회고와 전망
한국기독교신학논총
2001 .10
-
A Theological Method of Liberation Theology : A Theology of Anthropology
한국기독교신학논총
2005 .12
-
슐라이어마허의 신학구조론
한국조직신학논총
2007 .01
-
Korean Theology -Where It Has Been? Where Is It Going?
신학지남
1972 .06
-
A Study on the Schema for Rebuilding the Theology of Christian Education in Korea
기독교교육 논총
2011 .01
-
實踐神學, 어떻게 할 것인가?
신학과세계
1993 .12
-
한국여성신학 : 그 신학 새로하기의 어제와 내일
한국기독교신학논총
2001 .10
-
신학의 원초적 방법론으로서의 ‘철학적 신학’ : 신학과 인간학(즉, 철학)의 관계를 중심으로
인문학연구
2018 .06
-
21세기 한국신학의 방향 모색 : 이중성에서 삼중성으로
한국기독교신학논총
2013 .01
-
THEOLOGY OF REUNIFICATION : Asian Theologies in the 90's from the Perspective of Minjung Theology
신학논단
1992 .08
-
오순절 교육신학을 위한 기초적 연구
기독교교육정보
2004 .10
-
‘비-신학’의 틀로서 신학-하기: 급진적 관계성의 실현을 위한 정치신학담론 연구
한국조직신학논총
2019 .01
-
실천신학과 영성학의 창조적 만남
신학과 목회
2010 .05
-
춘계 이종성의 통전적 신학에서 신학과 철학의 관계에 대한 연구
장신논단
2016 .03
-
과학적 신학이란 무엇인가?
창조론오픈포럼
2015 .02
-
The Method of Pastoral Theology : Practical Theology of Care
한국기독교신학논총
2003 .07
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0