메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국외국어대학교 법학연구소 외법논집 외법논집 제31호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
87 - 114 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
'Substantive Consolidation' is a doctrine developed by U.S. courts for bankruptcy cases. Under this doctrine, the bankruptcy court may order the pooling of assets and liabilities of two or more entities, so that the liabilities of the entities involved are satisfied from common pool of assets created by consolidation. The Substantive Consolidation is not specifically authorized by the Bankruptcy Code; rather, it is based on courts' general equitable powers. For many U.S. cases, the courts declared that as the substantive Consolidation is extreme and imprecise remedy, it should be employed only rarely and as matter of last resort after considering and rejecting other remedies. The expectation of commercial markets and market players that the court would respect entity separateness should not be frustrated absent circumstances where equitable remedy is called upon. Substantive Consolidation may affect (i) the tiered corporate structure and (ii) the use of special purpose vehicles in securitization and other structure financing, as well as project financing transactions. Futhermore, Substantive Consolidation may bring international insolvency issue when a group of multinational members is involved in insolvency proceeding. Although it may be possible for Korean courts to exercise the same power as Substantive Consolidation without express legislative authorization, it would be desirable to have a specific provision in the bankruptcy code setting forth the requirements and effects of Substantive Consolidation.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (21)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0