메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국외국어대학교 법학연구소 외법논집 외법논집 제29호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
93 - 120 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The mixed jurisdiction as the third legal family has to show three characteristics that set them apart form other jurisdictions. The first characteristic feature ist the specificity of the mixture to which we refer. These Systems are built upon dual foundations of common-law and civil-law materials. The second characteristic is quantative and psychological. In the mixed-jurisdiction family one expects a large number of principles and rules to be of distinguishable pedigree, even including non-substantive aspects of the law, such as the nature of institutions and the style of legal thinking. Psychologically speaking, actors and observers within such a system will be cognizant of and will acknowledge the dual character of the law. It is to recognize a prevailing state of the legal mind. The third characteristic is structural. In every case the civil law will be cordoned off within the field of private law, thus creating the distinction between private continental law and public Anglo-American law. These three characteristics are the lowest common denominators of a mixed jurisdiction. If they ar accepted as reliable criteria, however, they afford a means of differentiating mixed jurisdictions from a wide variety of hybrid and pluralist systems. According to Palmer are there three historical situations in the mixed jurisdictions. The first occurred during the colonial era, when a civil-law sovereign transferred an overseas possession to a common-law colonial power. Intercolonial transfers during the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries were quite numerous and served as the triggering event for fashioning civil-law/common-law mixtures in South Africa, Quebec, the Philippines, Puerto Rich and Louisiana. The second situation occurred in Scotland which acquired a structurally mixed system by merging its sovereignty with that of Britain under the Act of Union of 1707. The third situation developed in the second half of the twentieth century. Israel's legal system was hybridized during the post-independence era because of an internal demographic and cultural shift within the society itself.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (38)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0