메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
고려대학교 법학연구원 고려법학 고려법학 제54호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
33 - 64 (32page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In september 1989, it happened that Muslim girlstudents were temporarily were barred by officials from attending school because they put on the headscarfs of islamic tradition in spite of the warning of school authority in a French public schools. Soon the incident roused the interest throughout the whole country. After the incident, the litigation of resemblant matters were repeated continuously and the law on restriction of wearing the religious clothing or insignia was enacted. Its regular French title is「Loi du 15 mars 2004 encadrant, en application de principe de la laïcité, le port de signes ou de tenue manifestant une appartenance religieuse dans les écoles, collèges et lycées publics」. But inquiring into the Stasi Report which became the basis of the law, we can know that it used the brilliant rhetorics about the laïcité and emphasized a vague public order only, not analyzing the headscarfs problem fairly and objectively. The report respected the majority's consciences that were according with the traditional national value, unity and identity. It made a wrong application of laïcité combined with religious freedom. Seen from a wider perspective, the minority's religious freedom is related to the treatment to muslims. In this view, there is a analysis that the headscarfs conflict is not a factor threatening the republic but the symptom showing the French republic in crisis. But seeing the judicial precedents of Conseil d'Etat, it made a clear and reasonable conclusion. That is, So far as the religious clothing composes a free exercise of religious freedom, it does not violate the religious neutrality in principle. Simultaniously Conseil d'Etat acknowledged the limits of freedom of religious clothing also. For example, the limits of freedom are to infringe on the other students’ freedom, to confuse the order within the school and to disturb a normal education etc. So, the Conseil d'Etat has made much of students’ religious freedom, the freedom of their parents’ religious education than the principle of laïcité and developed the precedents in direction of harmonizing with the students’ religious freedom and the order within the school elaborately. By the way, in France today it is considered that the state must take trouble to guarantee to the minority's religious freedom in the sphere that do not infringe the public good and this positive protection of state does not violate laïcité.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (40)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0