메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
고려대학교 법학연구원 고려법학 고려법학 제54호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
65 - 85 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The petitioner of constitutional complaint at the case 2007Hun-Ma1462 who was prosecuted because he declared “conscientious objection to the military service” as a responisible person enrolling millitary service, was sent to Young-Deung-Po jail in November, 23, 2006 after being sentenced to one and a half year imprisonment by Seoul Western District Court due to the crimes against military service law. The petitioner who tried to exercise his ballot at the 17th presidential election in Dec. 19, 2007, was not able to do so because he was conformed to the person who is under execution of sentence above confinement at the basic date of election day according to the Section 1(2), Article 18 of Public Officials Election Act. So, the petitioner claimed the Constitutional Complaint in Dec. 27, 2007, asserting that the Section 1(2), Article 18 of Public Officials Election Act is unconstitutional because it infringes the right to vote (Article 24 of Constitution), the right to pursue the happiness(Article 10 of Constitution) and the right of eqaulity(Article 11 of Constitution). The main topics of this case is whether this clause (Section 1(2), Article 18 of Public Officials Election Act) is constitutional or not and the Constitutional Court has already decided that it is constitutional through the decision of 2002 Hun-Ma 411 in March, 25, 2004. However the Constitutional Court acknowledged the unconstitutionality of the Public Officials Election Act restricting the suffrage of Koreans abroad. Through this case we can see more strict standard than the past. So it is the main topic of this case whether the precedent can be reversed. Although the petitioner claimed that the clause infringed the right to vote (Article 24 of Constitution), the right to pursue the happiness (Article 10 of Constitution) and the right of eqaulity(Article 11 of Constitution), we can hardly see the Section 1(2), Article 18 of Public Officials Election Act as unconstitutional because the meaning and limit of the voting right and the possibilities of restricting the fundamental rights of the convicted according to one's legal position, especially one's voting right. It is true that the suffrage of prisoners is restricted by the Section 1(2), Article 18 of Public Officials Election Act, however it does not break the justifiable boundaries of restriction because it is based on the justifiable purpose of legislation and the proportionality rule(Verhältnismäßigkeitsprinzip) is abided by. The same goes for the restriction of the right to pursue the happiness(Article 10 of Constitution), and the claims that it infringes the right of equality cannot get persuasion powers because the discrimination between prisoner and (general) people is rational. If we go back to the fundamental problem and regard the matter of restricting the voting right of prisoners as cannot be dealt with the legislator, this conclusion may be hard to agree with. However, we cannot say that it goes out of the boundaries of legislators' authority (legislative power) at this point in time, judging it comprehensively according to the previous review of legal theory and the investigation of foreign legislation from the viewpoint of comparative law.
#수형자 #선거권 #평등권 #공직선거법 #기본권제한 #Prisoner #the convicted) #voting right #the Right of Equality #Public Officials Election Act #the Restriction of Fundamental Rights

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (13)

참고문헌 신청
朴陽彬 / 2002 / 受刑者의 權利 / 법조 51 (1) : 42 ~ 79 google schola 강영철 / 2000 / 행형의 목적과 수형자의 재사회화 / 교정연구 (11) : 251 ~ 274 google schola 김완수 / 2002 / 수형자의 법적지위와 권리보호에 관한 연구 / 박사 / 원광대 대학원 google schola 박기석 / 2008 / 수형자의 기본권 보장과 특별예방 / 법과정책연구 8 (2) : 371 ~ 386 google schola 오경식 / 2007 / 교도소 수형자의 선거권 부여 방안에 대한 연구 / 矯正硏究 36 : 43 ~ 69 google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0