핵무기비확산조약(NPT) 체제의 분석과 국제법적 평가

이장희

추천

검색

자료유형: 학술저널

저자정보: 이장희

저널정보: 고려대학교 법학연구원 고려법학 고려법학 제50호

발행연도: 2008.1

수록면: 169 - 201 (33page)

이용수

📌

연구주제

📖

연구배경

🔬

연구방법

🏆

연구결과

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기

This article analyzes and evaluates “the Treaty on the Non- Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons”(NPT) regime from International Law Point of Views. This article is directly connected with Denuclearization on Korean Peninsula and nuclear weapon issues of North Korea. Since the NPT entered into force 1970, nuclear weapons states have shown scant inclination to abide by their promise of good faith negotiations to achieve nuclear disarmament. Without a serious effort by nuclear weapons states to achieve nuclear disarmament, the NPT will continue to promote double standards that allow some states to continue to expand and improve their nuclear arsenal while denying others of the same rights. In order to meet the challenges of today, the NPT and the non-proliferation regime is in urgent need of reconstruction. The NPT rests on three pillars; non-proliferation, disarmament and peaceful nuclear cooperation. The continuation of the current NPT regime that ignores existing double standards is destined to result in further nuclear proliferation and the use of nuclear weapons. Only by embracing significant changes that end existing double standards and elevate nuclear disarmament obligations can the non-proliferation regime succeed. The significant changes should include commencing negotiations on a Nuclear Weapons Convention, universal application o the NPT to all states under a strict timetable, entry into force of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty(CTBT), universal and equal application of the Additional Protocol, and the phased elimination of nuclear power. The NPT regime obligations are having less and less success in restraining the irresponsible behavior of nations, especially the treaty's nuclear weapons states, and the United States in particular. As nuclear weapons states move further away from their obligations under the treaty, they are simultaneously weakening incentives for non-nuclear weapons states to the treaty to remain within the NPT regime. If such regressions continue, they will inevitably lead to an abandonment of disarmament goals and gradual lack of interest by non-nuclear weapons states parties to remain within the regime's boundaries. It is time for members of the NPT regime to issue a clear statement outlining how the treaty is being undermined and by whom. In this context, the role of civilian grassroots and nongovernmental organization (NGOs)are very important in educating the public and influencing top level policy decisions among different countries in order to improve the NPT and non -proliferation regime. There is a good example such as ICBL( International Campaign to Ban Landmines) initiative for concluding the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty.

This article analyzes and evaluates “the Treaty on the Non- Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons”(NPT) regime from International Law Point of Views. This article is directly connected with Denuclearization on Korean Peninsula and nuclear weapon issues of North Korea. Since the NPT entered into force 1970, nuclear weapons states have shown scant inclination to abide by their promise of good faith negotiations to achieve nuclear disarmament. Without a serious effort by nuclear weapons states to achieve nuclear disarmament, the NPT will continue to promote double standards that allow some states to continue to expand and improve their nuclear arsenal while denying others of the same rights. In order to meet the challenges of today, the NPT and the non-proliferation regime is in urgent need of reconstruction. The NPT rests on three pillars; non-proliferation, disarmament and peaceful nuclear cooperation. The continuation of the current NPT regime that ignores existing double standards is destined to result in further nuclear proliferation and the use of nuclear weapons. Only by embracing significant changes that end existing double standards and elevate nuclear disarmament obligations can the non-proliferation regime succeed. The significant changes should include commencing negotiations on a Nuclear Weapons Convention, universal application o the NPT to all states under a strict timetable, entry into force of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty(CTBT), universal and equal application of the Additional Protocol, and the phased elimination of nuclear power. The NPT regime obligations are having less and less success in restraining the irresponsible behavior of nations, especially the treaty's nuclear weapons states, and the United States in particular. As nuclear weapons states move further away from their obligations under the treaty, they are simultaneously weakening incentives for non-nuclear weapons states to the treaty to remain within the NPT regime. If such regressions continue, they will inevitably lead to an abandonment of disarmament goals and gradual lack of interest by non-nuclear weapons states parties to remain within the regime's boundaries. It is time for members of the NPT regime to issue a clear statement outlining how the treaty is being undermined and by whom. In this context, the role of civilian grassroots and nongovernmental organization (NGOs)are very important in educating the public and influencing top level policy decisions among different countries in order to improve the NPT and non -proliferation regime. There is a good example such as ICBL( International Campaign to Ban Landmines) initiative for concluding the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty.

#핵무기비확산조약 #이중기준 #핵무기국가 #비핵무기국가 #핵군축 #비확산 #국제원자력기구 #국제대인지뢰금지대책회의 #포괄적핵실험금지조약 #중미 비핵지대조약/트라텔롤코조약 #Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons:NPT #double standards #nuclear weapons state #non-nuclear weapons state #nuclear disarmament #International Atomic Energy Agency:IAEA #non-proliferation #International Campaign to Ban Landmines:ICBL #the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty : CTBT #The Tlatelolco Treaty

참고문헌 (21)

참고문헌 신청

/ 1991 / Nuclear Weapons: A Comprehensive Study / United Nations

ICBL / / Landmine Monitor Report 2000

Langdon, Frank / 1973 / Japan's Foreign Policy, Vancouver: 5 University of British Columbia,1973

Peter Hayes / 1989 / American Nuclear Dilemmas in Korea / Lexington Books

Pogony, Istvan / 1987 / International Law, Avebury, Aldershot. Brookfield USA. Hong Kong. Singapore. Sydney,1987

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이장희

소속기관 고려대학교 법학연구원

주요연구분야 사회과학 > 법학

논문수 2 이용수 74

최근 본 자료

전체보기

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
AI 학습용 데이터	원문	원문 PDF 파일
AI 학습용 데이터	원문 + 메타 (기본/상세)	원문 PDF 파일 및 서지정보 CSV
대량 구매용 데이터	B2B 구독 방식	특정 자료 한정으로 원문 접근 권한 부여
대량 구매용 데이터	URL 전달 방식	바로 PDF 뷰어를 열람할 수 있는 URL 제공

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
AI 학습용 데이터	기본 메타	발행기관명, 간행물명, 권호명, 권(vol), 호(issue), 통권, 발행연도, 발행월, 논문명, 저자명, 시작페이지, 종료페이지, 전체페이지, 상세페이지URL
상세 메타 데이터	발행기관 메타	발행기관 이명, 영문명, 창립연도, 홈페이지URL, 발행기관 소개
	간행물 메타	부제목, 간행물 유형, ISSN, ISBN, 최초발행연도, 폐간연도, 간행빈도, 발행주기, 등재사항, 이용수, 피인용수, 권호수, 논문수, 표지이미지
	논문 메타	작성 언어, 부제목, 대등제목, 목차, 키워드, 초록, 이미지, 참고문헌, 이용수, 피인용수, 논문활용도, DBpia통합주제분류, KDC분류, DDC분류, 한국연구재단분류, UCI, DOI
	저자 메타	소속기관, 소속부서, 직급, 연구분야, 연구키워드, 이용수, 피인용수, 저자 논문활용도

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
※ 결합형/맞춤형 메타 데이터는 신청 내용에 따라 다양하게 제공 가능
이용순위 정보	주제분야별 많이 이용된 논문	“인문학”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	이용기관별 많이 이용된 논문	“중고등학교”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	세부기관별 많이 이용된 논문	“서울대학교”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	키워드별 많이 이용된 논문	“Chat GPT”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
키워드 정보	많이 이용된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 이용된 키워드
	많이 발행된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 발행된 키워드
	많이 검색된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 검색된 키워드
	연구 트렌드 키워드	특정 키워드 연관 연구동향 분석 데이터 키워드

논문 기본 정보

초록· 키워드

AI 요약

연구주제

연구배경

연구방법

연구결과

주요내용

목차

참고문헌 (21)

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

댓글(0)