메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
고려대학교 법학연구원 고려법학 고려법학 제48호
발행연도
2007.1
수록면
59 - 82 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Just as literature has always been taking parts in the formulation and development of law throughout the history, law has likewise had influence over literary works with means such as censorship. In spite of such intimacy, law and literature has not yet been treated as a major branch of legal studies. This article tries to demonstrate the external and internal correlation between literature and law, that literature and literary criticism could be greatly relevant not only to the understanding of politics of interpretation but also to the recovering of minor jurisprudence. As far as I'm concerned there may be both sides to the correlation: literature equilibrating law and law equilibrating literature. The former, on one hand, examines literary interpretation of court rhetorics and the application of literary susceptibilities to law. By doing so, law and literature could take performative action to reflect the usage of rhetorics in both law and the literary texts dealing with legal issues. It helps identifying different voices of the Other, so to speak, that were not properly heard in the existing discourse of human rights. On the other hand, the latter concentrates on how law intervenes in the formulation of literary works. The oldest and most common method would probably be censorship. The censoring of literature I'm talking about here, deals with more complex problem than just one-sided influence. When literature confronts censorship, it works out various literary alternatives to evade suppression, some of which improves quality of the work in the last place without intending so. The way literature responds to legal censorship would gradually bring change to law as well. Through these correlation suppressive structure of law would face aesthetical chance to reflect oneself and thereby reconstruct the way legal science talk and think about the problem of justice in this postmodern era we are facing now.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (28)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0