淸의 朝鮮使行 人選과 '大淸帝國體制'

구범진

추천

검색

자료유형: 학술저널

저자정보: 구범진

저널정보: 서울대학교 인문학연구원 인문논총 인문논총 제59호

발행연도: 2008.1

수록면: 179 - 228 (50page)

이용수

📌

연구주제

📖

연구배경

🔬

연구방법

🏆

연구결과

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기

Since Manchu army broke through the Shanhai pass 山海關and the Qing court moved its capital to Beijing, hundreds of Qing officials, as imperial envoys with either political or ritual missions, visited Seoul, Korea. In this paper, it has been revealed that Qing emperors selected their envoys to Korea exclusively from bannermen 旗人officials of higher ranks, or rank 3 and above. In other words, Han Chinese 漢人officials were systematically and consistently excluded from the diplomatic missions to Korea. In stark contrast, Qing imperial envoys to Liuqiu 琉球and Vietnam 安南/越南were chosen from officials of lower ranks, or rank 5 and below, and Qing emperors did not care whether they were bannermen or Han Chinese. According to Mark Mancall, Qing tributary states could be classified into two groups, or “the southeastern crescent” group and “the northwestern crescent” one. The countries of sedentary agricultural economy belonged to the former, while those of nomadic economy to the latter. In this dichotomy, Korea is considered as a member of the first group along with Liuqiu and Vietnam. Having discovered the difference between the appointment pool of Qing imperial envoys to Korea and that of Liuqiu and Vietnam, I think it necessary to reconsider Korea's membership in “the southeastern crescent” group and to give a second thought to the Qing view of the world as has been advocated by Mancall. Korea had much in common with the northwestern societies, such as Mongol tribes. Korea, along with the nomadic societies in Manchuria and Inner Mongolia, accepted Qing hegemony and joined the Qing tribute system by Qing military force before Manchu conquest of Ming China, while Liuqiu and Vietnam, former Ming tributary countries, came to be included, not by force but in their volition, in the list of Qing tributary states, as a corollary of Manchu conquest of Ming China. Diplomatic mission to Korea was not regarded as business of Han Chinese but that of bannermen, as was the case with the Qing adminstration of Mongol nomadic tribes, while Han Chinese officials were allowed to participate in the missions to Liuqiu and Vietnam without discrimination against them. Taking into account these facts, I argue the organizing principle that governed the Qing tribute system was the time when the society in question was incorporated into the Qing hegemonic world order, not the ecological system where it belonged, on which Mancall put primary importance.

Since Manchu army broke through the Shanhai pass 山海關and the Qing court moved its capital to Beijing, hundreds of Qing officials, as imperial envoys with either political or ritual missions, visited Seoul, Korea. In this paper, it has been revealed that Qing emperors selected their envoys to Korea exclusively from bannermen 旗人officials of higher ranks, or rank 3 and above. In other words, Han Chinese 漢人officials were systematically and consistently excluded from the diplomatic missions to Korea. In stark contrast, Qing imperial envoys to Liuqiu 琉球and Vietnam 安南/越南were chosen from officials of lower ranks, or rank 5 and below, and Qing emperors did not care whether they were bannermen or Han Chinese. According to Mark Mancall, Qing tributary states could be classified into two groups, or “the southeastern crescent” group and “the northwestern crescent” one. The countries of sedentary agricultural economy belonged to the former, while those of nomadic economy to the latter. In this dichotomy, Korea is considered as a member of the first group along with Liuqiu and Vietnam. Having discovered the difference between the appointment pool of Qing imperial envoys to Korea and that of Liuqiu and Vietnam, I think it necessary to reconsider Korea's membership in “the southeastern crescent” group and to give a second thought to the Qing view of the world as has been advocated by Mancall. Korea had much in common with the northwestern societies, such as Mongol tribes. Korea, along with the nomadic societies in Manchuria and Inner Mongolia, accepted Qing hegemony and joined the Qing tribute system by Qing military force before Manchu conquest of Ming China, while Liuqiu and Vietnam, former Ming tributary countries, came to be included, not by force but in their volition, in the list of Qing tributary states, as a corollary of Manchu conquest of Ming China. Diplomatic mission to Korea was not regarded as business of Han Chinese but that of bannermen, as was the case with the Qing adminstration of Mongol nomadic tribes, while Han Chinese officials were allowed to participate in the missions to Liuqiu and Vietnam without discrimination against them. Taking into account these facts, I argue the organizing principle that governed the Qing tribute system was the time when the society in question was incorporated into the Qing hegemonic world order, not the ecological system where it belonged, on which Mancall put primary importance.

#淸의 朝鮮使行 #칙사의 인선 #旗人칙사 #조공체제 #淸의 朝鮮인식 #Qing Envoys to Korea #Appointment of Qing Envoys #Bannerman Envoys #Qing Tribute System #Qing Perception of Korea

참고문헌 (52)

참고문헌 신청

/ / (滿漢合壁)淸內府一統輿地秘圖康熙 / 서울대학교중앙도서관소장, 大4709 53

/ / 淸廷三大實測全圖: 康熙皇輿全覽圖 / 外文出版社

/ 1969 / 朝鮮王朝實錄 / 國史編纂委員會

/ 1977 / 淸史稿 / 中華書局

/ 1978 / 同文彙考 / 國史編纂委員會

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

구범진

소속기관 서울대학교 인문학연구원

주요연구분야 인문학 > 인문학 일반

논문수 2 이용수 74

최근 본 자료

전체보기

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
AI 학습용 데이터	원문	원문 PDF 파일
AI 학습용 데이터	원문 + 메타 (기본/상세)	원문 PDF 파일 및 서지정보 CSV
대량 구매용 데이터	B2B 구독 방식	특정 자료 한정으로 원문 접근 권한 부여
대량 구매용 데이터	URL 전달 방식	바로 PDF 뷰어를 열람할 수 있는 URL 제공

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
AI 학습용 데이터	기본 메타	발행기관명, 간행물명, 권호명, 권(vol), 호(issue), 통권, 발행연도, 발행월, 논문명, 저자명, 시작페이지, 종료페이지, 전체페이지, 상세페이지URL
상세 메타 데이터	발행기관 메타	발행기관 이명, 영문명, 창립연도, 홈페이지URL, 발행기관 소개
	간행물 메타	부제목, 간행물 유형, ISSN, ISBN, 최초발행연도, 폐간연도, 간행빈도, 발행주기, 등재사항, 이용수, 피인용수, 권호수, 논문수, 표지이미지
	논문 메타	작성 언어, 부제목, 대등제목, 목차, 키워드, 초록, 이미지, 참고문헌, 이용수, 피인용수, 논문활용도, DBpia통합주제분류, KDC분류, DDC분류, 한국연구재단분류, UCI, DOI
	저자 메타	소속기관, 소속부서, 직급, 연구분야, 연구키워드, 이용수, 피인용수, 저자 논문활용도

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
※ 결합형/맞춤형 메타 데이터는 신청 내용에 따라 다양하게 제공 가능
이용순위 정보	주제분야별 많이 이용된 논문	“인문학”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	이용기관별 많이 이용된 논문	“중고등학교”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	세부기관별 많이 이용된 논문	“서울대학교”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	키워드별 많이 이용된 논문	“Chat GPT”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
키워드 정보	많이 이용된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 이용된 키워드
	많이 발행된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 발행된 키워드
	많이 검색된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 검색된 키워드
	연구 트렌드 키워드	특정 키워드 연관 연구동향 분석 데이터 키워드

논문 기본 정보

초록· 키워드

AI 요약

연구주제

연구배경

연구방법

연구결과

주요내용

목차

참고문헌 (52)

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

댓글(0)