지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 역사학회 역사학보 歷史學報 第221輯
- 발행연도
- 2014.3
- 수록면
- 33 - 60 (28page)
- DOI
- 10.16912/khr.2014.03.221.33
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Ming and Qing replacement in 17th century had been incidents that basically shook existing East Asia system led by Ming. Not only the Chinese who were under the political control of Qing and the Japanese who were totally independent from the political control of Qing but the ruling class of Joseon who maintained their political identity in spite of the fact that they had been conquered by Qing all tried to find a new way of response in extremely changed world.
The Chinese had no other option but to submit, because as times went by, possibility of restoration of Ming was gradually disappeared, and Qing was more and more stabilized. But the Japanese could design a new ideological, Japanese Sinocentric order in which Japan placed in center, leading surrounding barbarians, because they escaped from the political danger of Qing on account of geometric isolation.
The way of response of the ruling class of Joseon could lies between these two types of way. On one hand, they totally accepted the political hegemony of Qing regime, because they had been conquered by Qing in 1637, but on the other hand, they could design a new ideological Korean Sinocentric order in which Joseon placed in center, because they could maintained their own political identity in spite of military surrender. In sum, these dual response depended upon realistic conditions of Joseon since the 17th century.
The Chinese had no other option but to submit, because as times went by, possibility of restoration of Ming was gradually disappeared, and Qing was more and more stabilized. But the Japanese could design a new ideological, Japanese Sinocentric order in which Japan placed in center, leading surrounding barbarians, because they escaped from the political danger of Qing on account of geometric isolation.
The way of response of the ruling class of Joseon could lies between these two types of way. On one hand, they totally accepted the political hegemony of Qing regime, because they had been conquered by Qing in 1637, but on the other hand, they could design a new ideological Korean Sinocentric order in which Joseon placed in center, because they could maintained their own political identity in spite of military surrender. In sum, these dual response depended upon realistic conditions of Joseon since the 17th century.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 명청교체와 동아시아 질서의 변동
Ⅲ. 조선의 대외 정치적 대응방식과 성격
Ⅳ. 조선의 대내 사상적 대응방식과 성격
Ⅴ. 맺음말
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (2)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-910-001325397