메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국디자인트렌드학회 한국디자인포럼 한국디자인포럼 제53호
발행연도
2016.1
수록면
95 - 106 (12page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background Design critique in an educational setting is a communicative interaction between an instructor and students, sometimes with invited professionals through formal and informal feedback. Numerous design educators have investigated how students perceive the learning benefits of critiquing. Although education researchers have found that self-efficacy is one of the key factors in academic performance, researchers in design education rarely conducted studies on how self-efficacy influences students’ grades as academic outcomes. Thus, in this paper, we aim to quantitatively investigate how efficacies in design education relate with academic outcomes and students’ satisfaction from various aspects. Methods To find the relationship between efficacy in design studios and grades in design projects, we used three scales developed by Gaffney: Critique Self-efficacy, Studio Self-efficacy, and Design Communication Competence. We surveyed forty-four design students at K University from May 2016 to June 2016. An SPSS Statistics software was used to analyze the survey results. To conduct this analysis, we used bivariate correlation analysis, multiple linear regression analysis, and factor analysis. Result First, students’ efficacy predicted their anticipated grades, but not their final letter grades. In contrast, final letter grades are marginally correlated with Studio Self-efficacy. Second, satisfaction in critique activities positively correlates with Critique Self-efficacy, Studio Self-efficacy, and Design Communication Competence. However, this satisfaction did not predict final letter grades either. Lastly, satisfaction with Final Critique was more strongly correlated with both anticipated letter grades and final letter grades than satisfaction with Team Critique. Conclusion This study would help Korean design educators who are utilizing a critiquing method to understand their students’ efficacy and competence and how the factors relate with academic outcome.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0