메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국중동학회 한국중동학회논총 한국중동학회논총 제37권 제1호
발행연도
2016.1
수록면
1 - 47 (47page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The main purpose of this article is to analyze the Sykes-Picot Secret Agreement and its relation to nation-building in Lebanon and Syria. During the period of the First World War, three contradictory promises, including the Hussein-McMahon Correspondence, the Sykes-Picot Secret Agreement, and the Balfour Declaration were made by Britain with Arabs, Jews, and the French. Among these three, the Sykes-Picot Secret Agreement became the cornerstone of the subsequent division of the Levantine region into a series of separate nations after the war. This agreement was designed by Mark Sykes and François Georges-Picot, without considering the aspirations of the native people. According to their Imperial interests, Britain and France started to build artificial nations in their mandatory regions, but the new nations lacked basic conditions required for development into viable nations. As a result, political instability in these nations continues to exist until today. This paper also found that the difference between British and French colonial attitudes toward the Arab World affected the successes and failures of nation-building. The British was more cooperative with the local people, while the French employed more repressive measures to rule the natives. Due to these differences, nations built by the British have been more stable and peaceful, whereas nations built by the French, such as Lebanon and Syria, have experienced a greater deal of political instability and faced many difficulties after independence.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (31)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0