메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국경영법률학회 경영법률 경영법률 제20권 제1호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
377 - 416 (40page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
By the Insurance Business Act §.98 and Enforcement Decree of the Insurance Business Act §.46, any person who is engaged in the conclusion of insurance contracts or the insurance solicitation shall be prohibited from providing any policy holder or the insured or promising to provide any policy holder or the insured with special interests as money and goods, discount of premium, promise of paying the amount of insurance money in excess of the amount of insurance money etc. The prohibition clause functioned as a resale price maintenance of the insurance production. Such clause originated from USA anti-rebate statutes and Japanese Insurance Business Act §300 and remained essentially unchanged. But according to the changing business environment of insurance industry, even in the such countries arise the questions whether still need anti-rebate statute. The writer introduce the debate and changes in USA and Japan, and review the reasons of anti-rebate laws include the relation between the Insurance Business Act §.98 and the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Ac §.23 sec.1(3) as an act of unfairly coercing or inducing customers of competitors to deal with the enterpriser in question . The writer not conclude that what, if any, changes should be made Korea insurance anti-rebating clause. Possible legislative or regulatory changes was remained as a future study.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (28)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0